[P2P-F] P2P Vs Cooperative and Distributist approaches ?

Tue Dec 6 19:37:34 CET 2011

hi dante,

as you probably know, I explore this issue here,
http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Peerproperty

I have a pluralistic preference for this, i.e. I think a multitude of
private and common property forms should exist

but given the p2p dynamic in immaterial sharing, my own preference goes to
some form of distributism, i.e. each individual has a share of productive
resources (let's say a citizen share), which he can contribute to material
productive/provisioning activities, but also, crucially, take away, i.e.
the equivalent of forking,

Michel

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Dante-Gabryell Monson <
dante.monson at gmail.com> wrote:

> What does p2p "property", "governance" and "production" most relate to ,
> in comparison to other ( historic ) movements ?
> And what may people related to the p2pfoundation be supporting ?
>
> *Do we have access to a chart which compares each of these ?*
>
> And what "Laws" ( or absence of Laws ? ) would such p2p approaches support
> ?
>
> A limit to the concentration of personal wealth ?
> ( or on any wealth at all, including businesses ? )
> No moral person for corporations or any business entities ?
>
> Such limits leading to the sale of property, maintaining prices lower and
> hindering any artificial scarcity on land and resources ?
>
>
> ///
>
> Ownership of ones own basic means of production,
> combined with cooperatively owned property and means of production ?
> Distributism combined with Cooperative approaches ? ( see links below )
>
> - How would this compare to Anarcho Syndicalist forms of governance,
> production and property ( absence of private property ? ).
> - Or with Libertarian approaches ( in the US sense ).
> Differing from Libertarian approaches by Putting a ( moral ? ) limit to
> private accumulation ? - feel free to correct based on your understanding
> of Libertarianism -
> ( as in Distributism ? see :
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism#Anti-trust_legislation )
> - How would it also differentiate with Technocrats and the Technocratic
> Movement ( and/or the Venus Project and the Zeitgeist Movement ).
>
>
> ///
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism#Economic_theory
>
> Under such a system, most people would be able to earn a living without
> having to rely on the use of the property<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property> of
> others to do so. Examples of people earning a living in this way would be
> farmers who own their own land and related machinery, plumbers who own
> their own tools, software developers who own their own computer, etc.
>
> *The "cooperative" approach advances beyond this perspective to recognise
> that such property and equipment may be "co-owned" by local communities
> larger than a family, e.g., partners in a business.*
> *
> *
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism#Economic_theory
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
>

-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111207/f51e7842/attachment.htm 