[P2P-F] Fwd: "Senate Votes To Let Military Detain Americans Indefinitely"

Fri Dec 2 14:42:57 CET 2011

Why would they do this?
People say "Write your Representative" as though we, the people, were
in control.
Who do the Representatives really represent?

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Michel Bauwens <michel at p2pfoundation.net> wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dante-Gabryell Monson <dante.monson at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM
> Subject: "Senate Votes To Let Military Detain Americans Indefinitely"
> To: econowmix at googlegroups.com
>
>
>
> unfortunately, only the beginning, as confirmed by recent a recent law
> passing the senate in the US ?
>
> Senate Votes To Let Military Detain Americans Indefinitely
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/senate-votes-to-let-military-detain-americans-indefinitely_n_1119473.html
> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/12/senate-military-detention/
> also see :
> http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/30-signs-that-the-united-states-of-america-is-being-turned-into-a-giant-prison
>
>
>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dante-Gabryell Monson [mailto:dante.monson at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 1:14 PM
>> To: undisclosed-recipients
>> Subject: Article : "Why on earth would Congress advise violent militarised
>> reactions against its own peaceful constituents? "
>>
>> The shocking truth about the crackdown on Occupy
>>
>> The violent police assaults across the US are no coincidence. Occupy has
>> touched the third rail of our political class's venality
>>
>> Naomi Wolf
>> guardian.co.uk, Friday 25 November 2011 17.25 GMT
>>
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/25/shocking-truth-about-crackdown-occupy?newsfeed=true
>> large excerpts :
>> "US citizens of all political persuasions are still reeling from images of
>> unparallelled police brutality in a coordinated crackdown against peaceful
>> OWS protesters in cities across the nation this past week."
>> "The National Union of Journalists and the Committee to Protect
>> Journalists issued a Freedom of Information Act request to investigate
>> possible federal involvement with law enforcement practices that appeared to
>> target journalists. The New York Times reported that "New York cops have
>> arrested, punched, whacked, shoved to the ground and tossed a barrier at
>> reporters and photographers" covering protests. "
>>
>> "Journalist Chris Hayes reported on a leaked memo that revealed lobbyists
>> vying for an $850,000 contract to smear Occupy. Message coordination of this
>> kind is impossible without a full-court press at the top. This was clearly
>> not simply a case of a freaked-out mayors', city-by-city municipal
>> overreaction against mess in the parks and cranky campers. As the puzzle
>> pieces fit together, they began to show coordination against OWS at the
>> highest national levels."
>>
>> "The DHS cannot say, on its own initiative, "we are going after these
>> scruffy hippies". Rather, DHS is answerable up a chain of command"
>>
>> "for the DHS to be on a call with mayors, the logic of its chain of
>> command and accountability implies that congressional overseers, with the
>> blessing of the White House, told the DHS to authorise mayors to order their
>> police forces – pumped up with millions of dollars of hardware and training
>> from the DHS – to make war on peaceful citizens."
>>
>> "The mainstream media was declaring continually "OWS has no message".
>> Frustrated, I simply asked them. I began soliciting online "What is it you
>> want?" answers from Occupy. In the first 15 minutes, I received 100 answers.
>> These were truly eye-opening.
>>
>> The No 1 agenda item: get the money out of politics. Most often cited was
>> legislation to blunt the effect of the Citizens United ruling, which lets
>> boundless sums enter the campaign process. No 2: reform the banking system
>> to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to
>> restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by
>> President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks.
>> This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment
>> banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of
>> thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.
>>
>> No 3 was the most clarifying: draft laws against the little-known loophole
>> that currently allows members of Congress to pass legislation affecting
>> Delaware-based corporations in which they themselves are investors."
>>
>> "why on earth would Congress advise violent militarised reactions against
>> its own peaceful constituents? The answer is straightforward: in recent
>> years, members of Congress have started entering the system as members of
>> the middle class (or upper middle class) – but they are leaving DC privy to
>> vast personal wealth, as we see from the "scandal" of presidential contender
>> Newt Gingrich's having been paid $1.8m for a few hours' "consulting" to
>> special interests. The inflated fees to lawmakers who turn lobbyists are
>> common knowledge, but the notion that congressmen and women are legislating
>> their own companies' profitsis less widely known – and if the books were to
>> be opened, they would surely reveal corruption on a Wall Street spectrum.
>> Indeed, we do already know that congresspeople are massively profiting from
>> trading on non-public information they have on companies about which they
>> are legislating "
>>
>> "Since Occupy is heavily surveilled and infiltrated, it is likely that the
>> DHS and police informers are aware, before Occupy itself is, what its
>> emerging agenda is going to look like. If legislating away lobbyists'
>> privileges to earn boundless fees once they are close to the legislative
>> process, reforming the banks so they can't suck money out of fake
>> derivatives products, and, most critically, opening the books on a system
>> that allowed members of Congress to profit personally – and immensely – from
>> their own legislation, are two beats away from the grasp of an electorally
>> organised Occupy movement … well, you will call out the troops on stopping
>> that advance.
>>
>> So, when you connect the dots, properly understood, what happened this
>> week is the first battle in a civil war; a civil war in which, for now, only
>> one side is choosing violence. It is a battle in which members of Congress,
>> with the collusion of the American president, sent violent, organised
>> suppression against the people they are supposed to represent. Occupy has
>> touched the third rail: personal congressional profits streams. Even though
>> they are, as yet, unaware of what the implications of their movement are,
>> those threatened by the stirrings of their dreams of reform are not."
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com;
> Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
>