[P2P-F] Fwd: [gang8] Why Iceland voted NO

• Previous message: [P2P-F] is p2p akin to anarchism (does basic income require a centralized state?)
• Next message: [P2P-F] [gang8] Why Iceland voted NO
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dante, is there a way to subscribe to Michael Hudson's editorials?

Michel

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dante-Gabryell Monson <dante.monson at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: [gang8] Why Iceland voted NO
To: econowmix at googlegroups.com




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Hudson <michael.hudson at earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:03 PM
Subject: [gang8] Why Iceland voted NO
To: GANG8 <gang8 at yahoogroups.com>





Dear Gang,
    Here’s my commentary on Iceland’s NO vote.
    I look forward to the country’s countersuit against Britain for damages
caused by Brown’s peremptory action.
Michael

*Why Iceland Voted ‘No” *

  Michael Hudson


            About 75% of Iceland’s voters turned out on Saturday to reject
the Social Democratic-Green government’s proposal to pay $5.2 billion to the
British and Dutch bank insurance agencies for the Landsbanki-Icesave
collapse. Every one of Iceland’s six electoral districts voted in the “No”
column – by a national margin of 60% (down from 93% in January 2010).

             The vote reflected widespread belief that government
negotiators had not been vigorous in pleading Iceland’s legal case. The
situation is reminiscent of World War I’s Inter-Ally war debt tangle. Lloyd
George described the negotiations between U.S. Treasury Secretary Andrew
Mellon and Stanley Baldwin regarding Britain’s arms debt as “a negotiation
between a weasel and its quarry. The result was a bargain which has brought
international debt collection into disrepute … the Treasury officials were
not exactly bluffing, but they put forward their full demand as a start in
the conversations, and to their surprise Dr. Baldwin said he thought the
terms were fair, and accepted them. … this crude job, jocularly called a
‘settlement,’ was to have a disastrous effect upon the whole further course
of negotiations …”

            And so it was with Iceland’s negotiation with Britain. True,
they got a longer payment period for the Icesave payout. But how is Iceland
to obtain the pounds sterling and Euros in the face of its shrinking
economy. This is the major payment risk that is still unaddressed. It
threatens to plunge the krona’s exchange rate.

            The settlement proposal did lower the interest rates from 5.5%
to 3.2%, but it included running interest charges on the bailout since 2008.
It even included the extra-high interest charges that led depositors to put
their funds in Icesave in the first place. Icelanders viewed these interest
premiums as compensation for risks – that were taken and should be lost by
the high-interest Internet depositors.

             So the Icesave problem will now go to the courts. The relevant
EU directive states that “that the cost of financing such schemes must be
borne, in principle, by credit institutions themselves.” As priority
claimants Britain and the Netherlands will indeed get the lion’s share of
what is left from the Landsbanki corpse. That was not the issue before
Iceland’s voters. They simply aimed at saving Iceland from an open-ended
obligation to take the bank’s losses onto the public balance sheet without a
clear plan of just how Iceland is to get the money to pay.

            Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/johanna_sigurdardottir/index.html?inline=nyt-per><http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/johanna_sigurdardottir/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
warns that the vote may trigger “political and economic chaos.” But
trying
to pay also threatens this. The past year has seen the disastrous experience
of Greece, Ireland and now Portugal in taking reckless private sector bank
debts onto the public balance sheet. It is hard to expect any sovereign
nation to impose a decade or more of deep depression on its economy inasmuch
as international law permits every nation to act in its own vital interests.


            Attempts by creditors to persuade nations to bail out their
banks at public expense thus is ultimately an exercise in public relations.
Icelanders have seen how successful Argentina has been since it imposed a
crew haircut on its creditors. They also have seen the economic and
political disruption in Ireland and Greece resulting from trying to pay
beyond their means.

            Creditors did not give accurate advice when they told Ireland
that it could pay for its bank failures without plunging the economy into
depression. Ireland’s experience stands as a warning to other countries
about trusting overly optimistic forecasts by central bankers. In Iceland’s
case, in November 2008 the IMF staff projected yearend-2009 gross external
public and private debt at 160% of GDP – but observed that an exchange rate
depreciation of 30% would push the ratio to 240% of GDP, which would be
“clearly unsustainable.” But the most recent IMF staff report (January 14,
2011) shows end-2009 gross external debt at 308% of GDP, and estimates
end-2010 gross external debt at 333% – even *before* taking the Icesave and
other debts into account!

            The main problem with Iceland’s obligation to Britain and the
Netherlands is that foreign debt is not paid out of GDP. Apart from what is
recovered from Landsbanki (now with the help of Britain’s Serious Fraud
Office), the money must be paid in exports. But there has been no
negotiation with Britain and Holland over just what Icelandic goods and
services these countries would be willing to take in payment. Already in the
1920s, John Maynard Keynes pointed out that the Allied creditor nation had
to take some responsibility just how Germany could pay its reparations, if
not by exporting more to these countries. In practice, German cities
borrowed in New York, turned the dollars over to the Reichsbank, which paid
Britain and France, which paid the money back to the U.S. Government for
their Inter-Ally Arms debts. In other words, Germany tried to “borrow its
way out of debt.” It never works over time.

                The normal practice would be for Iceland to appoint a Group
of Experts to lay out the strongest possible case. No sovereign nation can
be expected to acquiesce in imposing a generation of financial austerity,
economic shrinkage and forced emigration of labor to pay for the failed
neoliberal experiment that has dragged down so many other European
economies.

875 words

__._,_.___
  Reply to sender<michael.hudson at earthlink.net?subject=Re%3A%20Why%20Iceland%20voted%20NO>|
Reply
to group <gang8 at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Why%20Iceland%20voted%20NO>|
Reply
via web post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxbWR0NzRqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBG1zZ0lkAzE1NzM5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTMwMjUzMDU5NA--?act=reply&messageNum=15739>|
Start
a New Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZ2htYzNlBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwMjUzMDU5NA-->
Messages in this
topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/message/15739;_ylc=X3oDMTM2YjNwMHRmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBG1zZ0lkAzE1NzM5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwMjUzMDU5NAR0cGNJZAMxNTczOQ-->(
1)
 Recent Activity:

   - New Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZmozdTJnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEzMDI1MzA1OTQ-?o=6>
   1

 Visit Your Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNHBxc3JuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTMwMjUzMDU5NA-->
 The gang8 list is devoted to Creditary Economics.
To unsubscribe, email: gang8-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

 [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkcGJuc2Q2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzEyMTA1NTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDAxOTkwBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzAyNTMwNTk0>
Switch to: Text-Only<gang8-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>,
Daily Digest <gang8-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest> •
Unsubscribe <gang8-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms
of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
   .

__,_._,___




-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110413/909fbe4e/attachment.htm 

• Previous message: [P2P-F] is p2p akin to anarchism (does basic income require a centralized state?)
• Next message: [P2P-F] [gang8] Why Iceland voted NO
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]