<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Hi Panos, all</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Sounds good to me (but others may have other ideas).</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">cheers</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Mathieu</p>
<br>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> JoPP-Public <jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of panayotis antoniadis <panayotis@nethood.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, November 12, 2018 20:50<br>
<b>To:</b> jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [JoPP-Public] Future of Journal of Peer Production (JoPP): the end of the line?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText"><br>
A refined, combined, idea:<br>
<br>
Issue #14 could be an open-ended "collective" issue, whose articles are<br>
edited by the JoPP community as a whole, indeed peer produced :-)<br>
<br>
They could include text from previous work, but "remixed" with the new<br>
collective text like what George Perec did in his "Life: a user manual",<br>
and also The residents with their music.<br>
<br>
There could be one new article every year or something, following a<br>
simple structure or narrative. It could be something around what needs<br>
to be done in this moment of crisis and urgency ...<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 12.11.18 10:05, Mathieu O'Neil wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Panos<br>
><br>
><br>
> I like it, though in my mind "OPEN" is taking shape as a war machine<br>
> against the academic paywalls of the world so needs to pack a punch<br>
> and have a clear shape. Then again it could indeed have a<br>
> future-facing section which keeps growing. Or #14 could be the issue<br>
> that keeps growing...? NO NAME?<br>
><br>
><br>
> As for the other idea, sure, I very much agree that we need to do more<br>
> outreach, via shorter texts, or slogans, posters, etc. Hopefully these<br>
> ideas will coalesce more when we finalise the ideas around OA/OPEN.<br>
><br>
><br>
> cheers<br>
><br>
> Mathieu<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *From:* JoPP-Public <jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org> on<br>
> behalf of panayotis antoniadis <panayotis@nethood.org><br>
> *Sent:* Monday, November 12, 2018 9:54<br>
> *To:* jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org<br>
> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Future of Journal of Peer Production<br>
> (JoPP): the end of the line?<br>
> <br>
><br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> Two quick ideas that came to my mind while watching a documentary on<br>
> "The residents", titled "Theory of obscurity", toward moving to more<br>
> "experimental" grounds and questioning the whole academic publishing<br>
> system at its roots.<br>
><br>
> First, I would reject the need for regular finalized issues, but would<br>
> like to see a publication that is "slow" and incremental. In that sense<br>
> why not treat the "Open" issue as truly open and keep adding articles to<br>
> it over time? This could keep the journal going on for very long, and<br>
> without stress :-)<br>
><br>
> Second, and more ambitiously, I think it would be interesting to produce<br>
> a whole "anonymous" issue, without naming the editors nor the authors<br>
> and without any references in the articles. Just "pure ideas". "Us" who<br>
> have more or less access to the "gated" world of knowledge, could we<br>
> summarize (a small part of) what is interesting to know without taking<br>
> ownership of the ideas, and without requiring from something to have<br>
> read 100 books to understand a single sentence?<br>
><br>
> I could write more about both ideas, but for now I just throw them to<br>
> you in case they could be transformed to something interesting :-)<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> Panos.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
JoPP-Public mailing list<br>
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public" id="LPlnk629432" class="OWAAutoLink" previewremoved="true">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>