<div dir="ltr">I've got no objections to the issue coming out at the same time as the law/disruption issue. It'd be good to check with Angela though.<br><br>cheers<br>steve<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div><div dir="ltr"><br>--<b><br>Dr Steve Collins</b><br>Senior Lecturer in Multimedia<br>Program Director / BA-Media / Bachelor Marketing and Media<br>Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies<br>
Macquarie University<br>
<br>P: (02) 9850 2165<br>W: <a href="http://bit.ly/122QivW" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/122QivW</a><br>L: Y3A 191D<br></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 March 2014 22:00, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jopp-public-request@lists.ourproject.org" target="_blank">jopp-public-request@lists.ourproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Send JoPP-Public mailing list submissions to<br>
� � � � <a href="mailto:jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
� � � � <a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
� � � � <a href="mailto:jopp-public-request@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public-request@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
� � � � <a href="mailto:jopp-public-owner@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public-owner@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of JoPP-Public digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
� �1. Re: JoPP Special Issue on 'Policy recommendations for a<br>
� � � P2P/commons-based society' (george dafermos)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:35:36 -0500<br>
From: george dafermos <<a href="mailto:georgedafermos@gmail.com">georgedafermos@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP Special Issue on 'Policy<br>
� � � � recommendations for a P2P/commons-based society'<br>
To: "Journal of Peer Production's general and public list"<br>
� � � � <<a href="mailto:jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public@lists.ourproject.org</a>><br>
Cc: Vasilis Kostakis <<a href="mailto:kostakis.b@gmail.com">kostakis.b@gmail.com</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
� � � � <CAC7Hk=<a href="mailto:Sm5uJ87Yqn3D9oKFsAuWB28QWE-B5JAPnoEFd24vqNdQ@mail.gmail.com">Sm5uJ87Yqn3D9oKFsAuWB28QWE-B5JAPnoEFd24vqNdQ@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi Mathieu,<br>
<br>
see my comments inline.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Mathieu ONeil <<a href="mailto:mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au">mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au</a>>wrote:<br>
<br>
> �Hi George, all<br>
> �Thanks for your message. Your wish to use the conference is perfectly<br>
> understandable.<br>
><br>
Thank you for understanding :)<br>
<br>
> There are a couple of considerations. First, we do already have a planned<br>
> release in Dec14/Jan15 (on law and disruption). So we would need to<br>
> coordinate with the law team for announcements.<br>
><br>
�The other question is about your planned follow-up issue, by<br>
> non-participants. This is what was originally planned:<br>
><br>
> >* Say if all goes well and you release Part 1 on 15 september 2014<br>
> *>* => CFP for Part 2 goes out also 15 september 2014<br>
> *>* => abstracts due 15 october 2014 (short)<br>
> *>* => decision by 30 october 2014<br>
> *>* => full article due 30 january 2015<br>
> *>* => reviews due 15 march 2015<br>
> *>* => revised articles due 15 may 2015<br>
> *>* => get signals, upload, etc<br>
> *>* => release july 2015*<br>
><br>
> �If you are still planning to release your CFP for Part 2 at the same<br>
> time as Part 1 is published (which makes sense) then that pushes back the<br>
> Part 2 release to Dec15/Jan16. Is this what you have in mind?<br>
><br>
Yes.<br>
<br>
<br>
> �So there are no objections from me but what do others think - in<br>
> particular the law issue eds? FWIW we released JoPP 1 and 2 at the same<br>
> date and it was no problem in my opinion.<br>
><br>
That's a very good idea, and i fully agree, why not release both issues at<br>
the same time?<br>
<br>
So, unless the editors of the law issue have any objections, we are going<br>
to release the special issue on 'policy proposals for a society of the<br>
commons' in Dec 2014 (rather than in Sep 2014, as originally planned).<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
-G.<br>
<br>
<br>
> �cheers<br>
> �Mathieu<br>
><br>
><br>
> �------------------------------<br>
> *From:* <a href="mailto:jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org</a> <<br>
> <a href="mailto:jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org">jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org</a>> on behalf of george dafermos <<br>
> <a href="mailto:georgedafermos@gmail.com">georgedafermos@gmail.com</a>><br>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 6, 2014 4:49<br>
> *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list<br>
> *Cc:* Vasilis Kostakis<br>
> *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] JoPP Special Issue on 'Policy recommendations<br>
> for a P2P/commons-based society'<br>
><br>
> � � Dear friends,<br>
><br>
> �There is something I'd like to ask you: Would it be a problem if we<br>
> postpone the release of the special issue of JoPP on 'Policy<br>
> recommendations for a society of the commons' for 3 months?<br>
><br>
> �The rationale for proposing this delay is that we (meaning the FLOK<br>
> Society Project) are organising a summit in Quito in the end of May with<br>
> the aim of reviewing and elaborating on the policy papers, so we thought it<br>
> is a good idea to change the deadline for submissions from March 31 to June<br>
> 31 so as to be able to incorporate the feedback given us at the summit. So,<br>
> if we do that, the time-frame will have to be modified as follows:<br>
><br>
> -deadline for the submission of papers: June 31 (instead of March 31)<br>
> �-end of review process: Aug 31 (instead of May 31)<br>
> �-deadline for re-submission of revised papers: Oct 31 (instead of July<br>
> 31)<br>
> �-special issue goes live on the web: Dec (instead of Sep)<br>
><br>
> �So, my question is, does anyone object to the proposed change in the<br>
> time-planning of the special issue?<br>
><br>
> �Best,<br>
> �-G.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> JoPP-Public mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org">JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public</a><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20140310/c96e1c00/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20140310/c96e1c00/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
JoPP-Public mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org">JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
JoPP: <a href="http://www.peerproduction.org" target="_blank">http://www.peerproduction.org</a><br>
<br>
End of JoPP-Public Digest, Vol 25, Issue 3<br>
******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>