Hi Franco, all<br /><br /><span>On 03/14/12, <b class="name">Franco Iacomella </b> <franco@p2pfoundation.net> wrote:</span><blockquote cite="mid:4F61148A.5020007@p2pfoundation.net" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text plain">El 10/03/12 20:40, Mathieu ONeil escribió:<br />>§ Homepage:<br />>This page has a menu-bar at the bottom with the different categories<br />>(research, debate, section).<br />>We dont really need this any more as we are not grouping articles in<br />>this way.<br />><br />>=> I can't modify this as this page appears to be blocked. Can you help?<br />>- thanks.<br /><br />To change that elements you need to go to Lustrel Options > Homepage tabs.</div></blockquote>OK, will try - thanks.<br /><br /><blockquote cite="mid:4F61148A.5020007@p2pfoundation.net" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text plain"><br /><br /><br />>§ About:<br />>-"Mission statement" should probably be renamed "Submission" as the<br />>mission statement part is already on the first page and there is a lot<br />>more content to be added which details the kind of submissions<br />>(research, debate, etc) which we are interested.<br />>-There is a page called "Participate" which should probably be renamed<br />>"Mailing lists" like this one: <<a href="http://cspp.oekonux.org/about/mailing-list" target="l">http://cspp.oekonux.org/about/mailing-list</a>><br />>This could also include a link to the still active jox cspp list.<br /><br />+1<br /><br />>=> Does everyone agree? I can't modify this either as all these page<br />>appear to be blocked. Can you help? - thanks.<br /><br />Since you are admin now, you should be able to modify it.</div></blockquote><br />OK<br /><blockquote cite="mid:4F61148A.5020007@p2pfoundation.net" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text plain"><br /><br /><br />>§ Research section:<br />>As you can see from say<br />><<a href="http://cspp.oekonux.org/research/mass-peer-activism/rs1.1-swedish-file-sharing" target="l">http://cspp.oekonux.org/research/mass-peer-activism/rs1.1-swedish-file-sharing</a>>, research<br />>articles have a lot of different files - there is a summary, the pdf of<br />>the paper, the pdf of final signals, and pdfs of backrgound material<br />>(the original submissions and reviews). The way it was set up in Plone<br />>was by having different pages for all these pdfs but it might be easier<br />>(if possible) to have them all on one page.<br />><br />>=> What do you think?<br /><br />I think that we should avoid that much ammount of files. I think that we should have:<br /> - pdf, html and epub of each article<br /> - pdf, html and epub of each issue</div></blockquote><br />Several points here:<br /><br />-Not sure what "epub" means?<br /><br />-If I understand correctly, you are talking about a system which automatically converts html into pdf? Thanks for confirming this.<br />That sounds great, but we would need to make sure the pdf structure is appropriate, ie looks like what we did for cspp 1 or at least not too different if possible.<br /><br />-Regarding the amount of files: I agree that there are a lot, but since this is an essential part of our opening up of the review process, which has been debated a lot by the group, I'm afraid we need to have all these files available - this only concerns research papers, not debates, comments or reports by the way so not too many articles really. So the question remains - can we fit all these files on one page?<br /><blockquote cite="mid:4F61148A.5020007@p2pfoundation.net" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text plain"><br />>§ Structure:<br />>I do need to return to the importance of having a page which gives a<br />>reasonably detailed summary of the content of each issue as FM does.<br />>Athina on this list and Francesca privately also agreed that this is<br />>necessary. So instead of the current content of the "Issue 0" page<br />>(which should in fact be the "Editorial") we should have something like:<br /><br />Ok, I understand your point now. I will try to work on this during next weekend. The final objetive is to have a page template that automatically generates this type of index per issue.</div></blockquote><br />Great, thanks.<br /><br />cheers<br /><br />Mathieu<br /><blockquote cite="mid:4F61148A.5020007@p2pfoundation.net" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text plain"><br /><br /><br />Best,<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />-- <br />Franco Iacomella<br /></div></blockquote>--<br signature="separator" />****<br />Dr Mathieu O'Neil<br />Adjunct Research Fellow<br />Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute<br />College of Arts and Social Science<br />The Australian National University<br />email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au<br />web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php