[JoPP-Public] JoPP-Public Digest, Vol 87, Issue 2

[Steve Collins]

Hi Mathieu (and everyone)

I think that's all good.

cheers
steve

On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 13:39, jopp-public-request at lists.ourproject.org <
jopp-public-request at lists.ourproject.org> wrote:

> Send JoPP-Public mailing list submissions to
> jopp-public at lists.ourproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
> <https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/tiokC3QNl1SorLvgcQwOgm?domain=lists.ourproject.org>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> jopp-public-request at lists.ourproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> jopp-public-owner at lists.ourproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of JoPP-Public digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Membership of jopp editorial group (Mathieu O'Neil)
> 2. Re: Membership of jopp editorial group (Mathieu O'Neil)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 03:01:37 +0000
> From: Mathieu O'Neil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
> To: Journal list <jopp-public at lists.ourproject.org>
> Subject: [JoPP-Public] Membership of jopp editorial group
> Message-ID:
> <
> SYBP282MB0409BAA2F1F29646D7FB7619C6AB0 at SYBP282MB0409.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi George, all
>
> Since we follow "do-ocratic" principles it seems right to me that George,
> who is the only person to have expressed support for the evolution of the
> journal proposal on jopp-public, should formally be invited to join our
> editors group - all the more so as he edited with Vasilis an issue on
> policies for the commons and that is part of what we aim to develop.
>
> @George: What do you say?
>
> @Other ed group members: hope this is OK?
>
> We have a process for adding new members to the editorial board:
> -a board member proposes someone on jopp-public;
> -he or she briefly introduces themselves and what they intend to
> contribute;
> -if no-one objects, after a week, they are included.
>
> We don't have a system in place for people joining the editors group
> (team? do we need a different term?). So far it's been done on a one-to-one
> basis. However since I've known George for a while I am pretty confident he
> will not mind being approached semi-publicly (hope I was right George -
> very sorry if I was wrong!).
>
> There is a related issue, common to volunteer projects: people still being
> included in a group although they have been inactive for a very long time.
> But, how do we address this? We need to be mindful of people's feelings and
> approach this in a caring and respectful way.
>
> So could we say something like:
>
> "Dear X, you have not contributed to discussions on jopp-ed for [one,
> two?] years. This can only mean you are no longer as interested in this
> activity as you once were. We understand that other priorities have taken
> over, which is fine. However we think it would be best for the project if
> we acted on this and you left the ed group, to make room for new members.
> We thank you for your many past contributions to the project and wish you
> the very best."
>
> How does everyone feel about this?
>
> cheers,
> Mathieu
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20200501/7e98dbdb/attachment-0001.html
> <https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/WieSC4QO8xSEwLx2cMkUfn?domain=lists.ourproject.org>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 03:12:20 +0000
> From: Mathieu O'Neil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
> To: Journal list <jopp-public at lists.ourproject.org>, Editors JoPP
> <jopp-editorial at lists.ourproject.org>
> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Membership of jopp editorial group
> Message-ID:
> <
> SYBP282MB0409A7D1CC21DD25C6B462C8C6AB0 at SYBP282MB0409.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> PS. Sorry everyone - this was meant to go to jopp-ed. UGH.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Mathieu O'Neil
> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 13:01
> To: Journal list <jopp-public at lists.ourproject.org>
> Cc: george dafermos <georgedafermos at gmail.com>
> Subject: Membership of jopp editorial group
>
> Hi George, all
>
> Since we follow "do-ocratic" principles it seems right to me that George,
> who is the only person to have expressed support for the evolution of the
> journal proposal on jopp-public, should formally be invited to join our
> editors group - all the more so as he edited with Vasilis an issue on
> policies for the commons and that is part of what we aim to develop.
>
> @George: What do you say?
>
> @Other ed group members: hope this is OK?
>
> We have a process for adding new members to the editorial board:
> -a board member proposes someone on jopp-public;
> -he or she briefly introduces themselves and what they intend to
> contribute;
> -if no-one objects, after a week, they are included.
>
> We don't have a system in place for people joining the editors group
> (team? do we need a different term?). So far it's been done on a one-to-one
> basis. However since I've known George for a while I am pretty confident he
> will not mind being approached semi-publicly (hope I was right George -
> very sorry if I was wrong!).
>
> There is a related issue, common to volunteer projects: people still being
> included in a group although they have been inactive for a very long time.
> But, how do we address this? We need to be mindful of people's feelings and
> approach this in a caring and respectful way.
>
> So could we say something like:
>
> "Dear X, you have not contributed to discussions on jopp-ed for [one,
> two?] years. This can only mean you are no longer as interested in this
> activity as you once were. We understand that other priorities have taken
> over, which is fine. However we think it would be best for the project if
> we acted on this and you left the ed group, to make room for new members.
> We thank you for your many past contributions to the project and wish you
> the very best."
>
> How does everyone feel about this?
>
> cheers,
> Mathieu
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20200501/349790a4/attachment.html
> <https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/bIfGC5QP8yS3rq1PhN4R_o?domain=lists.ourproject.org>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> JoPP: http://www.peerproduction.org
> <https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/r4CRC6XQ68f74QJ6c2hfhz?domain=peerproduction.org>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of JoPP-Public Digest, Vol 87, Issue 2
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20200501/e250938e/attachment.html>