[JoPP-Public] JoPP#10 update

[Mathieu ONeil]

Hi Peter


I guess this is relevant to jopp-public as we have never had "Varia" articles in JoPP before so we should document how we do it. At the same time not sure if this belongs on jopp-public for too long as some may think it's too technical and spammy. So leaving it on for now but we may need to move it to jopp-ed or just us if too much back and forth?


I see you have used the peer review categories for your varia articles - all fine. However the parent for these articles ("jopp10.varia") is currently the default frontpage template. So there is a problem with the settings somewhere - should be like peer reviewed articles top page?


Also we need links to those articles from the TOC. We put a placeholder for that.


Finally we should have some words in the editorial notes - a para about the articles themselves (for ex) and a couple of sentences about why we decided to have a Varia section?


Thanks for taking this on! Great that we can have two articles in #10.


cheers,


Mathieu



________________________________
From: JoPP-Public <jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler (HR) <p.troxler at hr.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 5:06
To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP#10 update

these 2 articles have now been added / Peter

On 4 May 2017, at 14:02, Troxler, P. (Peter) <p.troxler at hr.nl<mailto:p.troxler at hr.nl>> wrote:

Mathieu

I'd like to add 2 varia papers to the issue

/ Peter

On 14 Apr 2017, at 05:46, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au<mailto:mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>> wrote:


Hi all

A quick update on where we (Zack and I) are re. JoPP#10 Work and peer production.

The issue was scheduled for release in March/April but there have been and continue to be delays owing to circumstances outside our control. We are aiming for a late April/early May release.

Four out of five peer reviewed papers have been copy-edited and revised by eds. We are about to send these out to reviewers for signals and comments. It would be greatly appreciated if these could be expedited asap.

cheers,
Mathieu




_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org<mailto:JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org>
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public

_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org<mailto:JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org>
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20170509/a420e69e/attachment-0001.html>