[JoPP-Public] PDF versions of articles

Dr. Peter Troxler trox at fabfolk.com
Mon May 8 21:09:43 CEST 2017


Just following up on my own answer ... attached what the plugin produces currently

pdf filename appears to be an issue (would like to have JoPP and issue number and probably author in there
metadata needs to be looked at, too

 / Peter



> On 8 May 2017, at 21:05, Dr. Peter Troxler <trox at fabfolk.com> wrote:
> 
> HI all
> 
> I agree, it is desirable to have pdf versions of the articles easily available.
> 
> I've been investigating options, and currently this appears to me the most appropriate to our workflow
> http://wp.dinamiko.com/demos/dkpdf/ <http://wp.dinamiko.com/demos/dkpdf/>
> which is already installed on the site, but not yet fully tested and integrated into the publishing workflow
> 
> - needs full header/footer configuration (ISS, issue number, stuff like that)
> - need to test how this plugin interacts with the static html
> 
> Depending on my overall work load and the publishing progress of issue 10 we might be able to give it a spin this time round ...
> 
> Peter
> 
> PS. the plugin also has a paid cousin for generating pdfs of multiple content: https://codecanyon.net/item/dk-pdf-generator/13530581 <https://codecanyon.net/item/dk-pdf-generator/13530581>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 5 May 2017, at 11:22, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au <mailto:mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Peter, maxigas, all
>> 
>> Last October we had a discussion about the desirability of having JoPP listed in places such as the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). One of the questions applicants to DOAJ need to answer is whether they provide PDF versions of articles.  
>> 
>> It was decided to delay application to DOAJ until PDFs were back in play (to avoid having to modify the application (I admit I don't know for sure how complicated that would be)).
>> 
>> In any case - as Zack and I are currently preparing the release of JoPP#10 I thought it was a good opportunity to enquire about this: is there any chance we might have something in place in time for the upcoming release?
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> Mathieu
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> JoPP-Public mailing list
>> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org <mailto:JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org>
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20170508/8168d223/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Common sense- An examination of three Los Angeles community WiFi projects that?privileged public funding over commons-based infrastructure management.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 152778 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20170508/8168d223/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20170508/8168d223/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the JoPP-Public mailing list