[JoPP-Public] Broken page

[george dafermos]

In any case, "current" is a misleading name for that page; i think it's a
good idea to change it to something else. How do others feel about it?
x,
g.


On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
wrote:

>  Hi George, all
>
>
>  Well, as indicated by the emoji (?) "deadbeats" may be a bit strong.
> After all, we don't know for sure why they did not resubmit - they may have
> been sick for instance. So "interrupted" or "incomplete" or "uncompleted"
> may be less normative...?
>
>
>  cheers
>
>
>  Mathieu
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <
> jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <
> georgedafermos at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 6, 2015 7:41
> *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Broken page
>
>   A ha, I see. In that case, "deadbeats" shall be a fine name for that
> page :)
>
>  Lots of wishes for the New Year!
>
>  -G.
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi George
>>
>>
>>  The page is in the peer review tree so not really pointing to issues. It
>> was meant to list people who submitted to us then did not resubmit after
>> reviews - so if they then submitted and published elsewhere our reviewers
>> contribution would be documented at least.
>>
>>
>>  So "current" is a bit misleading as these subs are old now - maybe
>> rename it "deadbeats"? ;-)
>>
>>
>>  Open to suggestions...
>>
>>
>>  And happy new year to you and everyone else!
>>
>> ​cheers
>>
>>
>>  Mathieu
>>
>>
>>    ------------------------------
>> *From:* jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <
>> jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <
>> georgedafermos at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:49
>> *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
>> *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Broken page
>>
>>     I am feeling there's something wrong with this page:
>> http://peerproduction.net/peer-review/current/
>>
>>  Shouldn't that page be dedicated to the most recent issue of JoPP?
>>
>>  x,
>>  g.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> JoPP-Public mailing list
>> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20150107/9cac93d3/attachment.htm