[JoPP-Public] Narrow or wide columns for debate and comment papers?

george dafermos georgedafermos at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 17:48:31 CEST 2012


I, too, like the second option better.

x,
g.



On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The first comment is up:
> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/invited-comments/from-the-theory-of-peer-production-to-the-production-of-peer-production-theory/
>
> It's in a more narrow format - margin on the side but text is more dense.
>
> Another option is no margin, text is less bunched, see:
> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/debate-societal-transformation/a-practice-based-perspective/
>
> I guess the second option is better, text seems easier to read?
>
> Just thought I'd share this important question with everyone...
>
> cheers
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>



More information about the JoPP-Public mailing list