Don't get me wrong, I respect that other folks can be quite happy with Evil. I coded all day today with vanilla Emacs key bindings and found it delightfully...simple and free of paradigm conflicts. :-)<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Tom Short <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tshort.rlists@gmail.com">tshort.rlists@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Christoph LANGE <<a href="mailto:langec@web.de">langec@web.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Matt,<br>
><br>
> my 2 cents, well, maybe 10 cents, on your mail.<br>
><br>
> In short: Thanks for sharing your experience! Mine is quite different<br>
> though.<br>
><br>
> 2012-02-29 20:36 Matt Armstrong:<br>
>> In short: it is easier to use one editor at a time.<br>
><br>
> In contrast to your experience, I appreciate to be able to use two<br>
> editors at a time, and only Evil gives me the opportunity to do so.<br>
<br>
</div>My perspective is different, too. I've never really used Vim, so<br>
differences between Vim and Emacs don't really cause any headaches for<br>
me. Evil works smoothly for what I do. I might be tempted to try Vim,<br>
but I like Org-mode and ESS (with R) too much. I came to modal<br>
operation by way of using vimperator then pentadactyl in Firefox.<br>
<br>
- Tom<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
implementations-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:implementations-list@lists.ourproject.org">implementations-list@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>