<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Frank Fischer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.fischer@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de">frank.fischer@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:47:13PM +0100, Vegard Øye wrote:></div><div class="im">
> * Name?<br>
><br>
> Something new? Something catchy? Suggestions?<br>
<br>
</div>Hm, I think a new cool name would be good. I prefer short names or at<br>
least names that allow short prefixes for function names ;)<br>
<br>
I have no good idea so far, but I'll think about it ...<br></blockquote><div> </div><div>I'm just a lurker, but how about Vibrant? Prefix could be vib-. A surprising number of words that start with "vi" have a negative connotation or are already used for vi(m) clones, such as vile and vigor.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I really hope we can start a common project.<br></blockquote><font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><div class="gmail_quote">
<font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></font></div>Sounds promising.<br clear="all"></font><font face="'trebuchet ms', sans-serif">-- <br>/George V. Reilly <a href="mailto:george@reilly.org" target="_blank">george@reilly.org</a> Twitter: @georgevreilly<br>
<a href="http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog" target="_blank">http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog</a> <a href="http://blogs.cozi.com/tech" target="_blank">http://blogs.cozi.com/tech</a></font><br><div> </div></div><br>