Evil and package.el
Trevor Murphy
trevor.m.murphy at gmail.com
Wed Aug 8 19:51:03 CEST 2012
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:01:42 +0200
> From: Frank Fischer <frank-fischer at shadow-soft.de>
>
> Could you please provide an example how it confuses Emacs? The autoload
> cookie is defined as it is by intention (except that the
> interactive-mark (fourth argument to autoload) is missing), i.e. the
> function and the cookie are defined in evil-core.el but the file to be
> loaded is evil.el. I'm using package.el and I did not observe any
> problems with that. The autoload file `evil-autoload.el' is generated
> and used correctly.
Hi, Frank.
Of course, writing "Emacs is confused" should have been a reminder
that in fact *I* was confused.
The missing interactive mark threw me because I couldn't M-x
evil-mode. Not sure why my after-init-hook wasn't working at the time,
but this morning it's loading correctly.
Sorry for the mailing list noise; at least I learned something.
Trevor
More information about the implementations-list
mailing list