possible bug (or my mistake ;-)

Tue Oct 18 20:47:10 CEST 2011

Thank you very much for your quick answer,

I made it with the 
(define-key evil-normal-state-map "c" nil)
(define-key evil-motion-state-map "c" 'backward-char)
It might be useful to put two lines about this remapping issue in the project pdf. I would also suggest a few lines of explanation about each state (insert or visual are quite obvious for me, so does emacs, but I am quite confused about the motion state and couldn’t explain why h,j,k,l are mapped there and not in insert mode).
Evil will however greatly improve my work…

Damien Thiriet

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:04:43PM +0200, Félix Sipma wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I also use "bépo" and I confirm this bug. In order to get it work I had
> > to remap each "normal key" to "nil" before mapping it to a "motion key".
> > 
> > Ex:
> > 
> > (define-key evil-normal-state-map "c" nil)
> > (define-key evil-motion-state-map "c" 'backward-char)
> 
> This is exactly what you have to do (right now). The problem is that
> the key-bindings are in different keymaps. And it is important that
> some keys may be bound in different keymaps, e.g., "i" is bound to
> 'evil-insert in evil-normal-state-map and to
> 'evil-inner-text-objects-map in evil-operator-state-map.
> 
> Perhaps another function which binds some keysequence in one map and
> removes all active bindings in other maps may be convenient, something
> like
> 
> (evil-remap evil-motion-state-map "c" 'backward-char 
> :remove evil-normal-state-map)
> 
> or the other way around
> 
> (evil-remap evil-motion-state-map "i" 'what-ever
> :keep evil-operator-state-map)
> 
> I have no idea what the best solution is.
> 
> Frank
> 

Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça vous tente ?
Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net