Vimpulse and vim-mode

Tue Mar 1 23:10:51 CET 2011

On 2011-03-01 18:41 +0100, Tim Harper wrote:

> Perhaps it's just me, but if it's a choice between interoperability
> with Emacs at the cost of 97% compatibility with vim, and 100%
> compatibility with them at the cost of reduced interoperability with
> Emacs commands, I would prefer sacrificing the vim compatibility.
> If 100% vim compatibility were important to me, I would use vim.

Well put. I totally agree.

-- 
Vegard