XEmacs has no [remap].

Vegard Øye vegard_oye at hotmail.com
Fri Jul 23 16:04:28 CEST 2010

On 2010-07-23 15:18, Štěpán Němec wrote:

> Vimpulse uses remapping at a few places so I thought I'd mention
> that, as AFAIK Vegard tries to keep things XEmacs-compatible (and
> has my full moral support ;-D).

Yeah, I'm aware that XEmacs lacks remapping. The `vimpulse-remap'
macro tries to make do by storing remappings in an association list,
whence they can be retrieved by a specific function like
`vimpulse-operator-remapping'. There is no general solution.

> I'd love to be using XEmacs (see the recent copyright thread on this
> list), but it seems to only work reasonably well out-of-the-box in
> the terminal for me.

Are there any technical advantages to using XEmacs nowadays?


More information about the implementations-list mailing list