<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 629px; background-color: #999900;}
#tap{margin: 20px 0; font: 9px Times New Roman;}
#subj{font: 23px Arial; color: #ffff99 ; margin: auto auto 12px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#999900; padding-top: 20px;}
#imag1{max-width: 629px; background-color: #999900; padding: 11px; border: 3px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
Cannot look at this A-d as pics are invisible? <a href="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/l/lt1Q4148NOKP74VXJBL/78N275HPUAR5151J10DLN54553465TFFSYH93716302"> Go ahead and go here to re-load.</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/l/lt1H4148CNHO74GUFRL/78B275RUCDK5151M10UHO54553465ORRBHL93716302" id="subj"> Degrees, in Homeland-Security </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/l/lt1G4148MEHT74NKJVB/78Q275QIKEJ5151C10BNH54553465LADVOR93716302"><img src="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/im/P4148IUWT74DLBLI/78O275X5151RKB10KE54553465JUISYK93716302/img0747888.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/l/lc4I4148HXJM74VAGLJ/78C275KDHWG5151S10HVS54553465YITMMD93716302"><img src="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/im/J4148XXJI74HSISF/78F275S5151LQC10PE54553465IXDOSK93716302/img1747888.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<table style="width: 629px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 9px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="center" style="font: 11px;">decades, is that people now begin to combat sociological Darwinism by pointing to examples of mutual aid (symbiosis) which, Biology has only
lately discovered in the vegetable and animal kingdoms. Kropotkin, a defiant antagonist of liberal social theory, who never understood what he
rejected and combated, found among animals the rudiments of social ties and set these up in opposition to conflict, contrasting the beneficial
principle of mutual aid with the harmful principle of war-to-the-knife.51 Kammerer, a biologist enslaved by the ideas of Marxist Socialism,
demonstrated that in addition to conflict the principle of aid dominates life in Nature.52 At this point Biology returns to its starting-point,
Sociology. It<b>hands back the principle of divided labour given it by Sociology. It teaches Sociology nothing new,</b>nothing essential that had not
been included in the theory of the division of labour as defined by the despised clhiical political economy. 3: Conflict and Competition? </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 10px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p align="right" style="font: 9px;">[208] The social theories which are based on natural law start from the dogma that human beings are equal. Since all men are equal, they are supposed to
have a natural claim to be treated as members of society with full rights, and, because everybody has a natural right to live, it would be a violation
of right to try to take his life. Thus are formulated the postulates of the all-inclusiveness of society, of equality within society, and of peace.
Liberal theory, on the other hand, deduces these principles from utility. To Liberalism the concepts man and social man are the same. Society
welcomes as members all who can see the benefit of peace and social collaboration in work. It is to the personal advantage of every individual
that he should be treated as a citizen with equal rights. But the man who, ignoring the advantages of peaceful collaboration, prefers to fight and
refuses to fit himself into the social order, must be fought like a dangerous animal. It is necessary to take up this attitude against the
anti-social criminal and savage tribes. Liberalism can approve of war only as a defence. For the rest it sees in war the anti-social principle by </p>
<BR><BR>
<p align="left" style="font: 13px;">which social co-operation is annihilated. By confusing the fundamental difference between fighting and competition, the anti-liberal social theories sought to dishi the liberal principle
of peace. In the original sense of the word, “fight” means the conflict of men and animals in order to destroy each other. Man’s social life begins
with the overcoming of instincts and considerations which impel him to fight to the death. History shows us a constant retreat from conflict as a
form of human relations. Fights become less intense and less frequent. The defeated opponent is no longer destroyed; if society can find a way of
absorbing him, his life is spared. Fighting itself is bound by rules and is thus somewhat mitigated. Nevertheless war and revolution remain the
instruments of destruction and annihilation. For this reason Liberalism never ceases to stress the fact that they are anti-social. </p>
<BR>
<p align="center">It is merely a metaphor to call competition competitive war, or simply, war. The function of battle is destruction; of competition, construction.
Economic competition provides that production shall be carried on in the most rational manner. Here, as everywhere else, its task is the selection
of the best. It is a fundamental principle of social collaboration which cannot be thought out of the picture. Even a socialist community could not .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/unsKOLVI4148XK74OK/78IMV275SVOCO5151VHI10HA54553465KAE93716302"><img src="http://www.olionphany.me.uk/im/S4148AJKS74TWHIS/78S275I5151GHS10OV54553465OKSDMH93716302/img2747888.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>