<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<p style="font: 9px Verdana;">Cant read our Advertisement because of images being off? <a href="http://www.teamwork44.eu/l/lt22VFPPXF6319K81GHSWL/106QNR504I916Y10LW51381741K1805759865"> Go ahead and browse here.</a></p>
<br/>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="" href="http://www.teamwork44.eu/l/lt22UTDINJ6319F81AXORC/106KVJ504C916P10KG51381741O1805759865" style="font: 24px Georgia; text-transform: lowercase; margin: auto 13px auto;">Need Financing Click Here</a></p>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.teamwork44.eu/l/lt22DMSINS6319U81EUHEY/106SPF504E916S10JD51381741R1805759865"><img src="http://www.teamwork44.eu/im/TKAJI6319VQLF81K/106HBWCFD504IFUU916EOP10GCQ51381741HYUP1805759865/img158110636.jpg" alt="Need Financing Click Here" border="1" align="center">
<br/>
<a href="http://www.teamwork44.eu/unsFVKAYW6319YQBPGP81WOXK/106IFMB504FOBE916R10QED51381741M1805759865"><img src="http://www.teamwork44.eu/im/DMJHO6319WQYS81U/106MQJSTN504IFDW916HMU10XMO51381741SUSJ1805759865/img168110636.jpg" alt=""></a>
<br/>
<p>
<p style="background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #ffffff;">
<font color="white">
<!--
<div>
<blockquote>
<p></P><P></p><div>
want a requirement that industry scrub any
data of personal information before giving it to the government -- a
stipulation that Rogers and business groups say would be too onerous and
deter industry participation.Rogers, who co-sponsored the bill with Rep.
Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., the panel's top Democrat, said they altered
the bill to address other concerns by privacy groups raised last year.
But a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, Michelle Richardson,
said the bill is still objectionable because it could allow the military
to review data on private commercial networks."A couple of cosmetic changes
is not enough to address the concerns of members" in the Senate,
Richardson said.Rogers says the political calculus has changed and that
China's hacking campaign was too brazen for the White House to justify
the status quo."There's a line around the Capitol building of companies
willing to come in and tell us in a classified setting (that)
`my whole intellectual property portfolio is gone,"' Rogers said. "I've
never seen anything like this, where we aren't jazzed and our blood
pressure isn't up."In February, Obama signed an executive order that would
help develop voluntary industry standards for protecting networks. But the
White House and Congress agreed that legislation was still needed to address
the legal liability companies face if they share threat information. Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., promised at the
up the bill."We are
closer now than we have been in 25 years for serious immigration
reform," Durbin told reporters Wednesday after he and other Democrats in
the Senate negotiating group briefed members of the Congressional Hispanic
Caucus. "This president is behind it, and there is a strong, growing
bipartisan effort in the Senate to support it. We hope that the
House will do the same."Meanwhile tens of thousands of pro-immigration activists
massed outside the Capitol and in cities around the country to push
Congress to act. They waved American flags and carried signs reading, "Reform
immigration for America now!"The border security piece of the legislation
is critical to getting support from Republicans, but some Democrats have
opposed making a path to citizenship contingent on border security. Sen.
Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said that the new requirements wouldn't impede citizenship."A
lot of people here would not want to put dollars into the
border, but as a price to get citizenship, as long as it's
not an impediment to citizenship but rather works alongside citizenship,
it's something we can all live with," Schumer said, after talking to
the Hispanic House members. "What we've said all along is triggers have
to be objective and attainable in a way it doesn't interfere or
delay with people becoming citizens, and that's in the bill."According to
the person familiar with the proposals, the new border security requirements
call for 100 p
ess," he said. "Failure to commit to this kind of open
process is tantamount to an admission that the bill is not workable
and will not stand up to public scrutiny."Sessions and Lee have been
among the most skeptical Republican lawmakers when it comes to ongoing efforts
to draft an immigration overhaul.Those talks have largely been confined
to the so-called "Gang of Eight," which includes four Democrats and four
Republicans. A key member of that group is Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.,
who has along with Sessions and others urged Senate Democrats not to
rush the process.Separately, Sessions and two other Republican senators
on Wednesday sent a letter to the Republican members of the "Gang
of Eight" asking for specific details on the projected cost of the
immigration bill.Though a recent agreement between big labor and big business
on the issue of temporary worker cards was highly touted, the senators
have tried to draw attention to what is arguably the bill's most
controversial component -- the path to citizenship for up to 11 million
illegal immigrants."A primary concern related to a large-scale legalization
of illegal immigrants is the long-term cost for taxpayers," the lawmakers
said in the letter Wednesday. The letter was signed by Sessions, Sen.
Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan.Voicing concern that
illegal immigrants who eventually obtain a green card and later citizenship
would at some point be eligible for a host of
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
-->
</font>
</span>
</p>
</center>
<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.teamwork44.eu/unsFOXIXK6319FDJYWJ81OOPO/106SJML504UTAB916Q10UPQ51381741Q1805759865"><img src="http://www.teamwork44.eu/im/NYWCW6319CCDF81T/106DBOYPV504FUXJ916XFC10ADN51381741TQBK1805759865/img178110636.jpg" border="0" />
</body>
</html>