<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR
><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
<p style="font: 9px Verdana;">Cant view our Advertisement at all? <a href="http://www.stp-styly.eu/l/lc15LEV5886DW137QXRMO/160QCQDG505KGKB934EJBC10PV51381741AVAFDT1360075891"> Go ahead and browse here.</a></p>
<br/>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="" href="http://www.stp-styly.eu/l/lc15SQH5886DU137MSSMO/160UTTOL505DJIK934UFLS10OD51381741TTDCJG1360075891" style="font: 20px Trebuchet MS; text-transform: uppercase; margin: auto 14px auto;">Free Trial for Stronger Testosterone Level</a></p>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.stp-styly.eu/l/lc17XCQ5886BW137DVRRM/160MLGEY505JNHV934JOHE10EN51381741AAQDLW1360075891"><img src="http://www.stp-styly.eu/im/BNPEN5886SAFK137O/160UW505U934YVGM10GDXU51381741KF1360075891/img4113716036.jpg" alt="Free Trial for Stronger Testosterone Level" border="1" align="center">
<br/>
<a href="http://www.stp-styly.eu/unsBXFBQK5886OOND137ERSATX/160KISJ505FTIM934J10ORJLC51381741OPD1360075891"><img src="http://www.stp-styly.eu/im/VFIMV5886NTNG137T/160KE505G934AQBV10YPFP51381741HP1360075891/img4213716036.jpg" alt=""></a>
<br/>
<p>
<p style="background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #ffffff;">
<font color="white">
<!--
<div>
<blockquote>
<p></P><P></p><div>
Shown here is an iceberg off Ammassalik Island in Eastern Greenland.APA
recent video from a President Obama-aligned group is under fire from fact-checkers
for claiming hundreds of House members voted to call climate change a
"hoax" -- namely, because they didn't.The video from Organizing for Action
cleverly splices together quotes from Republican climate change skeptics
while building up to the factoid about the vote, which was on
an amendment to a broader bill in 2011.The video then includes the
following text: "Number of House members who voted in 2011 that climate
change was a 'hoax': 240."The amendment, though, did not include the word
hoax, and the circumstances of the vote were far more complicated than
the video portrayed. FactCheck.org and The Washington Post have both called
out the claim as inaccurate, with the Post giving it four "Pinocchios,"
which is the worst score for the truthfulness the paper gives out."In
this case, the Obama group has twisted the meaning of a relatively
minor amendment -- which was clearly intended to become fodder for future
campaign ads," the Post wrote.The amendment in question was introduced by
Democrats, in the course of debate over a Republican bill that dealt
with regulation, not the science of climate change itself. The Republican
bill was aimed at barring the EPA from regulating carbon dioxide and
other gases and giving that power to Congress.But, in an effort to
pressure Republicans, Democra
The Obama administration has tapped a veteran American diplomat to be the
new U.S. special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.Secretary of
State John Kerry says he chose Ambassador James F. Dobbins because of
his "deep and long-standing relationships in the region."Kerry called the
leaders of Afghanistan and Pakistan on Friday to inform them of his
decision. He praised Dobbins as one of America's "most accomplished diplomats."Dobbins
replaces Marc Grossman, who took the job after Richard Holbrooke died in
2010.Dobbins raised the flag over the U.S. Embassy in Kabul when it
reopened in 2001. He most recently has been serving as a director
at the RAND Corporation.
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
-->
</font>
</span>
</p>
</center>
<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.stp-styly.eu/unsTFURFI5886GRVO137FOHGSB/160TGDC505NTAR934V10YVRNU51381741EDC1360075891"><img src="http://www.stp-styly.eu/im/OPDGQ5886HRWK137R/160JO505J934WXXO10GGXD51381741MU1360075891/img4313716036.jpg" border="0" />
</body>
</html>