<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 687px; background-color: #cccccc;}
#tap{margin: 19px 0; font: 9px Times New Roman;}
#subj{font: 24px sans-serif; color: #000066 ; margin: auto auto 11px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#cccccc; padding-top: 10px;}
#imag1{max-width: 687px; background-color: #cccccc; padding: 12px; border: 8px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
Can't see this newsletter mailing below as no images present? <a href="http://www.jheenteirds.me/l/lt1LRS2949PLR75RWGB/79IJGSVN279EUCLU4583NDWRBG10FX54553465N1156180883"> Please browse this to reload 'em.</a>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.jheenteirds.me/l/lt1GLH2949BBU75VUTC/79VCNEVL279UCHWQ4583CMTBFU10JM54553465U1156180883" id="subj"> Drive around in...something sporty--Find exotic cars, online </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.jheenteirds.me/l/lt1YUG2949HWH75ESEY/79WABKGY279XBEFX4583UJLOMS10LV54553465F1156180883"><img src="http://www.jheenteirds.me/im/GV2949BMFAV75J/79UAKTCM279GIN4583E10KRKKOV54553465VDJ1156180883/img0757988.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.jheenteirds.me/l/lc4QOH2949YUF75CJMC/79FYYHJS279JVYSM4583DDGPNV10OM54553465Y1156180883"><img src="http://www.jheenteirds.me/im/XF2949QHENP75G/79XCKFBJ279NLC4583W10JDRVJW54553465FYL1156180883/img1757988.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<table style="width: 687px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 7px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="right" style="font: 16px;">rings, eleven attendants. The only instance in which there is nonconformity with observation, is that of Venus. Here it appears that the centrifugal
force is relatively greater than in the Earth; and, according<u>to the</u>hypothesis, Venus ought to have a satellite. Respecting this anomaly
several remarks are to be made. Without putting any faith in the alleged discovery of a satellite of Venus (repeated at intervals by five different
observers), it may yet be contended that as the satellites of Mars eluded observation up to 1877, a satellite of Venus may have eluded observation up
to the present time. Merely naming this as possible, but not probable, a consideration of more weight is that the period of rotation of Venus is but
indefinitely fixed, and that a small diminution in the estimated angular velocity of her equator would bring the result into congruity with the
hypothesis. Further, it may be remarked<U>that not exact, but only general, congruity is to be expected; since the process</U>of condensation of each
planet from nebulous matter can scarcely be expected to have gone on with absolute uniformity: the angular velocities of the superposed strata of
nebulous matter probably differed from one another in degrees unlike in each case; and such differences would affect the satellite-forming
tendency. But without making much of these possible explanations of the discrepancy, the correspondence between inference and fact which we find in </p>
<BR><BR>
<p align="center">so many planets, may be held to afford strong support to the Nebular Hypothesis. Certain more special peculiarities of the satellites must be mentioned as
suggestive. One of them<b>is the relation between the period of revolution and that of rotation. No</b>discoverable purpose is served by making the Moon
go round its axis in the same time that it goes round the Earth: for our convenience, a more rapid axial motion would have been equally good; and
for any possible inhabitants of the Moon, much better. Against the alternative supposition, that the equality occurred by accident, the
probabilities are, as Laplace says, infinity to one. But to this arrangement, which is explicable neither as the result of design nor of
chance, the Nebular Hypothesis furnishes a clue. In his Exposition du Système du Monde, Laplace shows, by reasoning too detailed to be here </p>
<BR>
<p align="left" style="font: 11px;">repeated, that under the circumstances such a relation of movements would be likely to establish itself. Among Jupiter’s satellites, which severally display these same synchronous
movements, there also exists a still more remarkable relation. “If the mean angular velocity of the first satellite be added to twice that of the
third, the sum will be equal to three times that of the second;” and “from this it results that the situations of any two of them being given, that of
the third can be found.” Now here, as before, no conceivable advantage results. Neither in this case can the connexion have been accidental: the
probabilities are infinity to one to the contrary.<U>But again, according to Laplace, the Nebular Hypothesis supplies a solution. Are not these</U></p>
<BR>
<p align="center" style="font: 15px;">significant facts? Most significant fact of all, however, is that presented by<i>the rings of Saturn. As Laplace remarks, they are,</i>as it were, still extant witnesses of
the genetic process he propounded. Here we have, continuing permanently, forms of aggregation like those through which each planet and satellite
once phied; and their movements are just what, in conformity with the hypothesis, they should be. “La durée de la rotation d’une planète doit .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.jheenteirds.me/unsCNHSX2949MJN75UJPGO/79RRCFW279COATNJ4583RSL10TBHX54553465OT1156180883"><img src="http://www.jheenteirds.me/im/PD2949DFYMU75Y/79YKARXH279FJL4583T10AJGDDE54553465KQG1156180883/img2757988.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>