<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 709px; background-color: #ffff33;}
#tap{margin: 19px 0; font: 11px Trebuchet MS;}
#subj{font: 21px Comic Sans; color: #ff0066 ; margin: auto auto 15px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#ffff33; padding-top: 10px;}
#imag1{max-width: 709px; background-color: #ffff33; padding: 11px; border: 6px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
Cannot see our newsletter below as no images present? <a href="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/334/4141.12tt54553465AAF1.php"> simply visit this now to reload.</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/334/4141.12tt54553465AAF1.php" id="subj"> See if a reverse mortgage is the best option </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/334/4141.12tt54553465AAF1.php"><img src="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/54553465/334.4141/img0848888.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/334/4141.12tt54553465AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/54553465/334.4141/img1848888.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>
<table style="width: 709px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 11px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="left">practice the EIS requirement enables determined parties to hold up projects indefinitely until the project developers agree to hi ransom or decide to
abandon their project. It should be added that members of Congress were evading their ethical obligations when they mandated environmental impact
statements as a way of satisfying the environmentalist lobby without offending any other specific interests. Bad laws often originate in this </p>
<BR><BR>
<p<i>align="left">way. environmental regulations that impose politically intolerable his are also ethically indefensible because they will not</i>be uniformly enforced. It
is unfair to impose hily requirements and then, after some have made substantial investments to meet the requirements, to suspend them for
everyone else because it turns out to hi too much. not only does that create incentives not to cooperate; it also discriminates against those who </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 10px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p>have been the most cooperative. Allowing environmental regulations to be shaped by a political process that is dominated by special interests is another ethically indefensible
procedure. While this is, of course, the only political process we have, we can at least recognize that environmentalists who object to the political
influence of special interests are themselves often special interests, sometimes with no strong regard for the principles of fair play. The
Natural Resources Defense Council, 60 Minutes’ Ed Bradley, and the others who orchestrated the national hysteria over Alar showed no concern for the
apple growers who had to bear the hi of their publicity-seeking. this was inexcusably unfair behavior that was undertaken to promote the </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial;"></span>
<p align="right" style="font: 14px;">institutional interests of the NRDC and the CBS network. Finally, there exists a strong ethical case for reviving and applying once
again the constitutional prohibitions against uncompensated takings. When we discover that concern for the environment requires a change in property
rights, the necessity of hiing compensation acts both to avoid injustice and to hiure that this really is a public interest requirement, not a
special interest action. Rezoning, for example, is an unfair way to “preserve public amenities.” If the public interest requires that a
particular urban hillside be left as a greenbelt, rather than be developed, the public should not be allowed to secure its amenity at the expense of
those who own the land by rezoning the land to prohibit development. Fundamental fairness requires that the public purchase the development </p>
<BR><BR>
<p align="right">rights from the owner.3 Observations on Conservatism It cannot have escaped the notice of even the most sympathetic reader that
all these implications of the fairness principle are<I>profoundly conservative, and that my conception of</I>social ethics privileges the status
quo. I am not bothered by that. If social justice requires above all else that we honor our promises, then social justice is itself profoundly
conservative. Promise-keeping is conservative in<b>that it binds the future to the past. And that is of enormous human</b>importance. When we honor our
promises, we help one another to realize in the future the expectations that we have formed on the basis of our past transactions. Promise-keeping
facilitates planning, including the formation of those life projects that constitute our individual identity. There is an important sense in which </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial;"></span>
<p align="right" style="font: 12px;">the opposite of conservative is capricious. As Edmund Burke observed, a society without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation. What was tolerable yesterday and .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/u/2712/334/4141/12/54553465/ginga-argentina@lists.ourproject.org"><img src="http://www.oscuepperrei.eu/2712/84/88/54553465/334.4141/img2848888.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>