El Sáb 29 Nov 2003 17:12, Sebastian Bassi escribió:

SB Por lo general la FSF es la que toma la posta de defender a los autores SB que publican bajo la GPL. Defender de manera "comunitaria" o "social" pero no legalmente. Es la FSF si vos ponés el copyright bajo la FSF, sino vos sos el autor, sos el único habilitado legalmente para hacer las acciones legales. Fijate que en:

http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html dice "Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses. This means that only the copyright holders are empowered to act against violations. The FSF acts on all GPL violations reported on FSF copyrighted code, and we offer assistance to any other copyright holder who wishes to do the same. But, we cannot act on our own if we do not hold copyright. Thus, be sure to find out who the copyright holders of the software are before reporting a violation. " Y en http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ReportingViolation dice: "What should I do if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program. If that is the Free Software Foundation, write to <[email protected]>. Otherwise, the program's maintainer may be the copyright holder, or else could tell you how to contact the copyright holder, so report it to the maintainer. " Lo que sí es verdad es que no creo que existan abogados en el mundo que estén tan capacitados para defender este tipo de casos como los de la FSF. -- Descargue al manual para nuevos usuarios de GNU/Linux de http://obed.com.ar/doc/