To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: team@fsfla.org
Subject: Re: [Team] =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cpeace_agreement=E2=80=9D?= with
	SOLAR, =?utf-8?Q?V=C3=ADa?= Libre, FSFs?
References: <ord47k1h0v.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
	<E1MWFXn-0001XT-Tp@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<orws5r9dz0.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
	<E1MWXfu-0003ZZ-Q2@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ory6q6t27b.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
From: Alexandre Oliva <lxoliva@fsfla.org>
Organization: Free thinker, not speaking for FSF Latin America
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:10:52 -0300
In-Reply-To: <ory6q6t27b.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (Alexandre
	Oliva's message of "Thu\, 30 Jul 2009 16\:12\:24 -0300")
Message-ID: <orzlakoegz.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jul 30, 2009, Alexandre Oliva <lxoliva@fsfla.org> wrote:

> On Jul 30, 2009, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>> They assume continuity which I personally dispute.  How can we be held
>> responsible and be required to make up for things that were done before
>> we existed, before any of the current members joined the organization?
>> Even more so when all the records of  FSF de los Pampas  were erased,
>> and we effectively started from scratch in December 2006.

>> Perhaps they do not realize that FSF LA effectively started from
>> scratch in December 2006.

> It seems very insane to me, but they seem quite set on that line of
> reasoning.

Turns out it actually makes sense :-(

See, we haven't actually changed much of our site.  The same documents
published back then are still there, and quite prominent while at that.
The initial declaration of intent, the mission, the goals drafted by the
first organization, newsletters and all.

That's because we made a decision back then to avoid the impression of
discontinuity.

With all this, any external observer, without the benefit of our
knowledge about what happened, might reasonably arrive at the same
conclusion.  Heck, even our announcements say we started in 2005!  We
can't have it both ways.


Now, most external observers, without all the baggage that they carry,
might take a =E2=80=9Coh, right, we made this decision, it seemed to make s=
ense
then, but we didn't know about all this baggage; can we please leave it
behind?=E2=80=9D at face value and leave it at that.

But they've grown so suspicious and distrustful that they don't believe
it, and they seem to take it as some kind of trick, to fool them again.
It's perfectly understandable.

So they demand some public declaration in which we repudiate our past
and declare that we started anew back then.  Diego suggested:

 "En el 2006 empezo una nueva etapa en la FSFLA y los actuales miembros
  repudiamos los hechos que dieron lugar a la anterior FSFLA, nos
  comprometemos a nunca mas promover exclusiones de algun tipo en la
  difusion del soft libre en america latina y a poner nuestro esfuerzo
  en la recuperacion del da=C3=B1o causado esperando con ello, entre otras
  cosas limpiar nuestro nombre".

This wording makes me a bit uncomfortable, but there's nothing in it
that I particularly disagree with it:

- It is true that we started afresh then.

- It is true that we set ourselves aside from earlier acts; heck, we
  don't even know about most of them

- We're not in the business of excluding; when people are promoting
  Software Freedom, they're helping us advance our mission.  However,
  this has to be worded very carefully to avoid setting up a trap for
  ourselves, that someone could later use to get us to do or not do
  things we ought to.

- It's not clear how much effort would be involved in repairing the
  damage, so this might be overcommitment.  Watch out for traps.

- I don't like the fact that there's a need to clean up our name, but it
  is hard to believe that it's not there, so we might as well do
  something about it, or resign ourselves to its remaining there.

Regardless, perhaps we need to renew our web site so as to reflect what
we are today.  I'm not suggesting that we remove or hide our history,
but rather that we write down the chapters that followed, so that we
don't present such outdated snapshots as if they were current.

--=20
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
