Fwd: From Rajani: On Alienation: : A Non-Eurocentric View
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: r kanth <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:54 AM Subject: Fwd: From Rajani: On Alienation: : A Non-Eurocentric View To: Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> * Further Notes on Euro-Modernism** * On Alienation* *Alienation* is a major theme in European discourse, both theological and philosophical, in its EM (EuroModernist) phase. Marx , one of the great canonicals in that august lineage*, e.g.,* noted several aspects of alienation: of workers - from their product, from the production process(run by owners/agents) , from each other(via ‘competition’) , and from their own *species essence* *(Gattungswesen*). I wish to identify the last as specially important, if in a marginally different sense, as far as our ‘species-essence’ goes– perhaps – from Marx. I also wish to add another species of alienation, a little less relevant, perhaps, to a child of the enlightenment, and an heir to industrial society, like Marx: *i.e*. *alienation from nature.* *** *Gattungswesen.* I have argued that , *contra *all the norms of EM, we as a species are *affective *beings, led to seek the felicity of warm kindred relations, *instinctually:* familial, co-operative, and communal. EM, by setting up its *alternate * template of competition, acquisitivenessness, individualist, self-seeking behavior (as in the pseudo-science of “Economics”), offers a paradigm strikingly opposed to this human essence. This sets up not so-called ‘cognitive dissonance’ – a buzz-word if ever there was one - but , even deeper, an *existential nightmare* for humans *compelled to act against their very own natures.* *This is the ontic basis of angst and despair, noted by existentialist writers, for generations.* This is why the so-called ‘happiness index’ is so low in all societies *most ‘advanced’ in EM norms*, such as the US; and why the UK, uabashedly, recently set up , no less, a ministry for ‘loneliness’. * *Nature.* We are , *contra *the shibboleths of Biblical ideology, part of nature,* i.e* ., we are *animals* Even the radical Marx, echoing his own Judeo-Christian heritage, spoke of “Man’ proudly as the ‘sovereign of creation”. He hadn’t studied Darwin (Darwin’s classic work was published, late: the same year as one of Marx’s classic works: 1859). *At any rate, we are part of nature*: and when we are kept away from it*, as we are, more or less, in all EM societies,* in arid cityscapes of cement and steel, our ‘spirits sag’ (all but unconsciously) and we experience an ineffable distress (poetically depicted in Keats’ To One Who Has Been Long in City Pent’ verse) . Presumably parks exist , here and there, in cities, to alleviate that disorder. *It is a unique form of alienation* – *i.e.* *suffering* - lifted by that trope of ‘*One Touch of Nature”, as Shakespeare had it, that “ Makes the Whole World Kin" * . It is a misery quite akin to that caused by the rupture with *Gattungswesen.* * To sum up. In my view, we are, as a species, alienated when separated from *family, community, and nature.* Marx, subscribing – as did most all his peers in political economy - - to EM’s (philosophical) *materialism* , prioritised *human engagement in production* as critical (‘work’ is an important concept in Protestant -Calvinist - theology as well), whence his ‘alienations’ , leastways, begin in that domain. *I theorise, au contraire, the priority of family, culture, and society, within the geist of our species.* Native American children, cruelly and brutishly separated from their families/culture/ and society by their oppressors, as part of an ‘experiment’ to ‘civilise the savage’ , apparently died ‘mysteriously’ in large numbers, or so it is reported. *No: no mystery.* It is explained by what I argue, above: *no EM philosophy can ‘explain’ it.* *This alienation is critical*: at its extreme, *we suffer a loss of being, of sanity, of wholeness, and incur a debilitating anomie when so separated.* *I will repeat: when separated from family, community, and nature, we experience a critical breach of what we could term the wholeness of being.* For humans, involuntary isolation could well be the ultimate terror (which is why being put away’ in solitary ‘ is such a barbaric mode of ‘correction’). Such ‘isolation’ is now, sadly, near-chronic in EM societies (*vide *Ministries of Loneliness) It may well account for the unmistakable madness of our (EM) age, in the final stages of what I have termed, in my recent book (2017) ‘Human Devolution’. I will conclude by repeating my principal thesis : *in virtually Everything it claims , represents, or commends, Euromodernism is categorically mistaken : and , worse, more often than not, positively injurious to human existence. * The sooner we see through, and reject, its many charades, the sooner we might have a chance to save what still remains of our social, natural , and emotive/personal, world. **EuroModernism *, *or EM, for short, is my term for the specific form of Modernism that Europe first invented, and imposed on itself, and its benighted populace, and then exported - perforce, to its everlasting detriment - to the world at large.* R E F E R E N C E S Kanth, R. *Breaking with the Enlightenment*, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997 _______ *Farewell to Modernism,* NY: Peter Lang, 2017 *[©R.Kanth 2018] * -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
Thank you Rajani, for this interesting essay. So much here I would endorse, that we seek the felicity of 'warm kindred relations', and that our separation from nature promotes disease. One aspect of alienation that you don't name, though it is implicit in this article, is alienation from ourselves. (Did the 'self' exist for Marx outside of its position in the economic and historical structure of society?) What we are seeing currently is a challenge to conventional gender divisions, based on claims to the 'validity of subjective experience'. LGBTQ plus non binary offer a whole range of alternatives to those who feel constricted by conventional gender assignments. This choice is being given to children as young as 10 years old within the UK education system, and the UK Labour Party has recently agreed to accept applicants for women's positions from those who 'self-identify as women'. Questioning gender divisions also challenges our whole notion of what we think of as 'masculine' and 'feminine' qualities. What Is happening now within EM (to use your terminology) is that there is beginning to be a recognition of the validity of a subjective experience, which is not tied to social norms. This freedom allows us to see that though there may be distinct biological differences, (and even these vary much more than is generally supposed) between masculine and feminine, this does not define qualitative differences between genders. Women are free to be as 'masculine' as they want and vice versa. This is acknowledged within enlightenment philosophies, by proposing that everybody has both masculine and feminine qualities within them, 'the yin yang paradigm'. Although this makes a nonsense of the distinction between masculine and feminine qualities, yet it seems difficult for people to abandon that mindset. Perhaps it is time for you to re-assess your thoughts on this as quoted from Wikipaedia: "that men and women are distinct sub-species embodying a "paradigm of masculinity" and a "paradigm of femininity", respectively, correlated to violence and nurturance, that are basically instinctual in nature despite their cultural variation". Anna
On 11 Jul 2018, at 03:27, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: r kanth <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:54 AM Subject: Fwd: From Rajani: On Alienation: : A Non-Eurocentric View To: Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>
Further Notes on Euro-Modernism*
On Alienation
Alienation is a major theme in European discourse, both theological and philosophical, in its EM (EuroModernist) phase.
Marx , one of the great canonicals in that august lineage, e.g., noted several aspects of alienation: of workers - from their product, from the production process(run by owners/agents) , from each other(via ‘competition’) , and from their own species essence (Gattungswesen).
I wish to identify the last as specially important, if in a marginally different sense, as far as our ‘species-essence’ goes– perhaps – from Marx.
I also wish to add another species of alienation, a little less relevant, perhaps, to a child of the enlightenment, and an heir to industrial society, like Marx: i.e. alienation from nature.
*
Gattungswesen.
I have argued that , contra all the norms of EM, we as a species are affective beings, led to seek the felicity of warm kindred relations, instinctually: familial, co-operative, and communal.
EM, by setting up its alternate template of competition, acquisitivenessness, individualist, self-seeking behavior (as in the pseudo-science of “Economics”), offers a paradigm strikingly opposed to this human essence.
This sets up not so-called ‘cognitive dissonance’ – a buzz-word if ever there was one - but , even deeper, an existential nightmare for humans compelled to act against their very own natures.
This is the ontic basis of angst and despair, noted by existentialist writers, for generations.
This is why the so-called ‘happiness index’ is so low in all societies most ‘advanced’ in EM norms, such as the US; and why the UK, uabashedly, recently set up , no less, a ministry for ‘loneliness’.
*
Nature.
We are , contra the shibboleths of Biblical ideology, part of nature, i.e ., we are animals
Even the radical Marx, echoing his own Judeo-Christian heritage, spoke of “Man’ proudly as the ‘sovereign of creation”.
He hadn’t studied Darwin (Darwin’s classic work was published, late: the same year as one of Marx’s classic works: 1859).
At any rate, we are part of nature: and when we are kept away from it, as we are, more or less, in all EM societies, in arid cityscapes of cement and steel, our ‘spirits sag’ (all but unconsciously) and we experience an ineffable distress (poetically depicted in Keats’ To One Who Has Been Long in City Pent’ verse) .
Presumably parks exist , here and there, in cities, to alleviate that disorder.
It is a unique form of alienation – i.e. suffering - lifted by that trope of ‘One Touch of Nature”, as Shakespeare had it, that “ Makes the Whole World Kin" .
It is a misery quite akin to that caused by the rupture with Gattungswesen.
*
To sum up.
In my view, we are, as a species, alienated when separated from family, community, and nature.
Marx, subscribing – as did most all his peers in political economy - - to EM’s (philosophical) materialism , prioritised human engagement in production as critical (‘work’ is an important concept in Protestant -Calvinist - theology as well), whence his ‘alienations’ , leastways, begin in that domain.
I theorise, au contraire, the priority of family, culture, and society, within the geist of our species.
Native American children, cruelly and brutishly separated from their families/culture/ and society by their oppressors, as part of an ‘experiment’ to ‘civilise the savage’ , apparently died ‘mysteriously’ in large numbers, or so it is reported.
No: no mystery.
It is explained by what I argue, above: no EM philosophy can ‘explain’ it.
This alienation is critical: at its extreme, we suffer a loss of being, of sanity, of wholeness, and incur a debilitating anomie when so separated.
I will repeat: when separated from family, community, and nature, we experience a critical breach of what we could term the wholeness of being.
For humans, involuntary isolation could well be the ultimate terror (which is why being put away’ in solitary ‘ is such a barbaric mode of ‘correction’).
Such ‘isolation’ is now, sadly, near-chronic in EM societies (vide Ministries of Loneliness)
It may well account for the unmistakable madness of our (EM) age, in the final stages of what I have termed, in my recent book (2017) ‘Human Devolution’.
I will conclude by repeating my principal thesis : in virtually Everything it claims , represents, or commends, Euromodernism is categorically mistaken : and , worse, more often than not, positively injurious to human existence.
The sooner we see through, and reject, its many charades, the sooner we might have a chance to save what still remains of our social, natural , and emotive/personal, world.
*EuroModernism , or EM, for short, is my term for the specific form of Modernism that Europe first invented, and imposed on itself, and its benighted populace, and then exported - perforce, to its everlasting detriment - to the world at large.
R E F E R E N C E S
Kanth, R. Breaking with the Enlightenment, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997
_______ Farewell to Modernism, NY: Peter Lang, 2017
[©R.Kanth 2018]
-- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list
Blog - http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net Wiki - http://www.p2pfoundation.net
Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making a donation. Thank you for your support. https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
/Nature./ We are , /contra /the shibboleths of Biblical ideology, part of nature,/i.e/ ., we are /animals/ Even the radical Marx, echoing his own Judeo-Christian heritage, spoke of “Man’ proudly as the ‘sovereign of creation”. He hadn’t studied Darwin (Darwin’s classic work was published, late: the same year as one of Marx’s classic works: 1859). /At any rate, we are part of nature/: and when we are kept away from it/, as we are, more or less, in all EM societies,/ in arid cityscapes of cement and steel, our ‘spirits sag’ (all but unconsciously) and we experience an ineffable distress (poetically depicted in Keats’ To One Who Has Been Long in City Pent’ verse) . Presumably parks exist , here and there, in cities, to alleviate that disorder. A very welcome offer Ranjani, I'd like to add to, even extend what you suggest. And I look forward to any comments that may arise. For reasons of experiences that I will pass over here, I have come to understand that the 'alienation' of people from Nature and of Civilisation from Nature is a profoundly damaging category error. Swallows build nests on the walls outside this room, beavers build dams, hornets created a kind of skyscraper in a room above my head... 'nature'. People create washbasins, airliners, cities, railways homes and offices.... also 'nature'. /It is all nature/. From a planetary perspective there is nothing that isn't nature. I have struggled to find a way of describing this integration, what might bridge nature-and-civilisation? A colleague suggested 'wilderness', and as I have dug deeper into this I have come to understand economics, families, bodies politics and civilisations as myriad interconnected wildernesses. If this seems a bit off the page, think of wilderness as a vernacular way of talking about systems theory, complexity theory etc. and if it still seems off the page, take a look at part 2 of my recent video Messages From The Blue Planet <https://vimeo.com/257467422> that seeks to open this up as a non linear, affective, imaginal take on where we are with ourselves on this planet; and that might, though it's very late, go some way to heal the alienation you speak about. Again, thanks for opening up this topic. Denis On 11/07/2018 03:27, Michel Bauwens wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *r kanth* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:54 AM Subject: Fwd: From Rajani: On Alienation: : A Non-Eurocentric View To: Michel Bauwens <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
* Further Notes on Euro-Modernism**
*On Alienation*
**
/Alienation/ is a major theme in European discourse, both theological and philosophical, in its EM (EuroModernist) phase.
Marx , one of the great canonicals in that august lineage/, e.g.,/noted several aspects of alienation: of workers - from their product, from the production process(run by owners/agents) , from each other(via ‘competition’) , and from their own /species essence/ /(Gattungswesen/).
I wish to identify the last as specially important, if in a marginally different sense, as far as our ‘species-essence’ goes– perhaps – from Marx.
I also wish to add another species of alienation, a little less relevant, perhaps, to a child of the enlightenment, and an heir to industrial society, like Marx: /i.e/. /alienation from nature./
/*/
/Gattungswesen./
I have argued that , /contra /all the norms of EM, we as a species are /affective /beings, led to seek the felicity of warm kindred relations, /instinctually:/ familial, co-operative, and communal.
EM, by setting up its /alternate /template of competition, acquisitivenessness, individualist, self-seeking behavior (as in the pseudo-science of “Economics”), offers a paradigm strikingly opposed to this human essence.
This sets up not so-called ‘cognitive dissonance’ – a buzz-word if ever there was one - but , even deeper, an /existential nightmare/ for humans /compelled to act against their very own natures./
/This is the ontic basis of angst and despair, noted by existentialist writers, for generations./
This is why the so-called ‘happiness index’ is so low in all societies /most ‘advanced’ in EM norms/, such as the US; and why the UK, uabashedly, recently set up , no less, a ministry for ‘loneliness’.
*
/Nature./
We are , /contra /the shibboleths of Biblical ideology, part of nature,/i.e/ ., we are /animals/
Even the radical Marx, echoing his own Judeo-Christian heritage, spoke of “Man’ proudly as the ‘sovereign of creation”.
He hadn’t studied Darwin (Darwin’s classic work was published, late: the same year as one of Marx’s classic works: 1859).
/At any rate, we are part of nature/: and when we are kept away from it/, as we are, more or less, in all EM societies,/ in arid cityscapes of cement and steel, our ‘spirits sag’ (all but unconsciously) and we experiencean ineffable distress (poetically depicted in Keats’ To One Who Has Been Long in City Pent’ verse) .
Presumably parks exist , here and there, in cities, to alleviate that disorder.
/It is a unique form of alienation/ – /i.e./ /suffering/ - lifted by that trope of ‘/One Touch of Nature”, as Shakespeare had it, that “ Makes the Whole World Kin" /.
It is a misery quite akin to that caused by the rupture with /Gattungswesen./
*
To sum up.
In my view, we are, as a species, alienated when separated from /family, community, and nature./
Marx, subscribing – as did most all his peers in political economy - - to EM’s (philosophical) /materialism/ , prioritised /human engagement in production/ as critical (‘work’ is an important concept in Protestant -Calvinist - theology as well), whence his ‘alienations’ , leastways, begin in that domain.
/I theorise, au contraire, the priority of family, culture, and society, within the geist of our species./
Native American children, cruelly and brutishly separated from their families/culture/ and society by their oppressors, as part of an ‘experiment’ to ‘civilise the savage’ , apparently died ‘mysteriously’ in large numbers, or so it is reported.
/No: no mystery./
It is explained by what I argue, above: /no EM philosophy can ‘explain’ it./
/This alienation is critical/: at its extreme, /we suffer a loss of being, of sanity, of wholeness, and incur a debilitating anomie when so separated./
/I will repeat: when separated from family, community, and nature, we experience a critical breach of what we could term the wholeness of being./
For humans, involuntary isolation could well be the ultimate terror (which is why being put away’ in solitary ‘ is such a barbaric mode of ‘correction’).
Such ‘isolation’ is now, sadly, near-chronic in EM societies (/vide /Ministries of Loneliness)
It may well account for the unmistakable madness of our (EM) age, in the final stages of what I have termed, in my recent book (2017) ‘HumanDevolution’.
I will conclude by repeating my principal thesis : /in virtually Everything it claims , represents, or commends, Euromodernism is categorically mistaken : and , worse, more often than not, positively injurious to human existence. /
The sooner we see through, and reject, its many charades, the sooner we might have a chance to save what still remains of our social, natural , and emotive/personal, world.
*/*EuroModernism /*, /or EM, for short, is my term for the specific form of Modernism that Europe first invented, and imposed on itself, and its benighted populace, and then exported - perforce, to its everlasting detriment - to the world at large./
RE FERENCES
Kanth, R./Breaking with the Enlightenment/, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997
_______/Farewell to Modernism,/ NY: Peter Lang, 2017
*[©R.Kanth 2018]*
-- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list
Blog - http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net Wiki - http://www.p2pfoundation.net
Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making a donation. Thank you for your support. https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
participants (3)
-
Anna Harris -
Denis Postle -
Michel Bauwens