---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Great Transition Network <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:07 PM Subject: Marxism and Ecology: Common Fonts of a Great Transition (GTN Discussion) To: [email protected]

From Fred Magdoff <[email protected]>

------------------------------------------------------- Reflections on the essay by John Bellamy Foster The Great Transitions Initiative is a reflection of the growing understanding that the very way capitalism functions is at the center of the ecological crisis that befalls the earth and its inhabitants. For this reason, people associated with the Initiative have written that they “…envision the advent of a new development paradigm redirecting the global trajectory toward a socially equitable, culturally enriched, and ecologically resilient planetary civilization.” But why does capitalism—which I would describe as an economic system rather than a “development paradigm”— need replacing? What would a “socially equitable, culturally enriched, and ecologically resilient planetary civilization” be like? The significance of Karl Marx for the GTI is that his work offers a comprehensive analysis and understanding of capitalism—not only as an economic system, but also its political, social, and ecological ramifications. The development of his ideas and theories did not come out of the thin air. Rather, they were based on an incredible amount of hard work—detailed studies of history, economics, anthropology, science, and consultation of government documents. As John Bellamy Foster has laid out in detail, Marx and Frederick Engels were aware of the negative effects that capitalism was having on the ecosystem. Their remarkable writings contain what can only be considered as advanced ecological concepts, very much concerned with the human interaction (metabolism) with the rest of natural world, especially in relation to the growth of capitalist economies in the 19th Century. Let me summarize my view of the key ideas that come directly out of the Marxist tradition as they relate to our current environmental crisis: The “laws of motion” of capitalist economies govern the operation of the system at its most basic level and compels it to strive to attain continual growth of individual firms (with competition and buyouts destroying some in the process, leading to larger and larger companies) and the entire economy. In the process, capitalism expands geographically to become a world system—something that was evident from its very inception in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. There can be no such system as “no-growth capitalism.” For when growth falters (recessions and depressions), the system is in economic crisis, with much human suffering. Also, there can be no such concept as “enough” in capitalist economies, because in order to accumulate ever greater amounts of capital—the driving force of the system—new products are created continually and more of all products must be sold next year than this one. This drives a complex and multifaceted sales effort—amounting to some ten percent of the economy— to convince people that they “need” these products. Capitalists and their allies also work politically, militarily, and economically to eliminate barriers to accumulation of profits—the unstated, but underlying, goal of deregulation efforts, reduced taxes on corporations and the wealthy, the multilateral trade agreements such as NAFTA, the WTO, covert actions to destabilize “unfriendly” governments, and outright warfare. As capitalism normally operates, what economists nowadays call “externalities” are created—negative social and ecological effects. Not needing to avoid or remedy the “externalities” (except for a few regulations to curb some of the excesses) is key to understanding why capitalism is so profitable. As Engels wrote in the 19th Century: “What cared the Spanish planters in Cuba, who burned down forests on the slopes of the mountains and obtained from the ashes sufficient fertiliser for one generation of very highly profitable coffee trees – what cared they that the heavy tropical rainfall afterwards washed away the unprotected upper stratum of the soil, leaving behind only bare rock! In relation to nature, as to society, the present mode of production is predominantly concerned only about the immediate, the most tangible result...”(1) It is capitalism’s inability to rationally regulate the human interaction with nature and its resources that results in environmental crises (local, regional, and global) as well as depletion of resources, threatening the lives of generations to come. This is the problem addressed in Marx’s famous theory of the metabolic rift. As Naomi Klein notes in This Changes Everything, “Karl Marx…recognized capitalism’s ‘irreparable rift’ with ‘the natural laws of life itself’…[Today] the Earth’s capacity to absorb the filthy byproducts of global capitalism’s voracious metabolism is maxing out.” (2) Fulfilling everyone’s basic needs on an equitable basis so as to allow for the development of each person’s full human potential will require the conscious regulation of the interactions between humans and resources. While this does not guarantee an ecologically sound economy, attaining such a goal is inconceivable without the people who actually do the work taking into account the needs of posterity. For example, if local fisheries are under the control of people in coastal villages—rather than in the hands of large commercial trawlers owned by companies trying to maximize profits—there is the need to fish in ways that preserve the productivity (or better yet, reproductivity) of this important resource. The only way to consciously regulate the interaction with resources is through a democratic approach that takes seriously Marx’s contention, that Foster quotes—“Even an entire society, a nation, or all simultaneously existing societies taken together, are not owners of the earth. They are simply its possessors, it beneficiaries, and have to bequeath it in an improved state to succeeding generations as boni patres familias [good heads of the household].” Some thoughts of basic principles, practices, and operating procedures of such an economy and society have been outlined in my article, “An Ecologically Sound and Socially Just Economy”— www.monthlyreview.org/2014/09/01/an-ecologically-sound-and-socially-just-economy/ . 1. Frederick Engels, “The Part Played by Labour in the Transformation from Ape to Man,” in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1975), vol. 25:463. 2. Naomi Klein, This Changes Everything (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2014), 177, 186. Fred Magdoff ************************************ Tuesday, September 1, 2015

From Paul Raskin <[email protected]>

----- Dear GTN, Our SEPTEMBER DISCUSSION focuses on an important new essay by John Bellamy Foster, “Marxism and Ecology: Common Fonts of a Great Transition.” Foster, the editor of Monthly Review, traces the origins of Marxian concepts, and discovers deep ecological roots that anticipate such contemporary notions as sustainable development and planetary boundaries. The way I see it, industrial capitalism spawned two powerful oppositional streams: social justice and environmental protection. For much of their history, these movements were mutually suspicious (insofar as they even heeded one another). Many social justice proponents saw environmentalism as a preserve of the elite; environmentalists found unacceptable social change agendas that failed to extend their critique to the system’s impacts on nature. Moreover, the dismal environmental record of “actually existing socialism” reinforced the perception that socialism is as feckless as capitalism. Now, Foster illuminates the historical record and closes the fissure, finding the foundations for a modernized ecological socialism that can play a key role in building an integrated planetary praxis. I encourage you to read the essay at www.greattransition.org/publication/marxism-and-ecology and to share your thoughts and questions. Comments are welcome through SEPTEMBER 30. Looking forward, Paul Raskin GTI Director NOTE ON GTI’S PUBLICATION CYCLE: GTN discussions occur in ODD-NUMBERED months, and GTI publishes in EVEN-NUMBERED months. Each discussion takes up a new essay or viewpoint prior to its publication. After the discussion closes, GTI publishes the piece, edited comments from the discussion, and a response from the author. You can review all GTN discussions at www.greattransition.org/forum/gti-forum. ------------------------------------------------------- Hit reply to post a message Or see thread and reply online at http://www.greattransition.org/forum/gti-discussions/169-marxism-and-ecology... Need help? Email [email protected] -- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/