Dear Anna, I reacted in a friendly way as soon as the accusations streamed in, asked Kevin to correct the oversight, and got a torrent of lies and abuse in return, while we are to blame for the oversight, that's really all we did. And given that the core of the accusation and unhappiness was that we published the excerpts she had asked us to publish herself, it would be particularly unwise to publish more, I have really learned my lesson. For two years we published and promoted Heather's work, and I don't know much other people who did. All that material is still there for people to read and think about. Without serious apologies for the harm she caused, for me, that is the end of the story. It's not censorship, I just don't want anymore diffamation campaigns and will stay away as far as I can, Michel <<Message: 4 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:53:05 +0000 From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [P2P-F] not publishing next binding chaos review To: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>, p2p-foundation <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Kevin and Michel, I feel sad that this 'ruckus' has resulted in censoring Heather's work. Could we admit that a misunderstanding resulted from right and wrong on both sides, rather than trying to maintain a totally blameless stance? Since things have now settled down, would it be possible to review the decisions taken in the heat of battle? Best wishes, Anna -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/