Re: [P2P-F] [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy"
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium, I would focus this one on labor issues, let me know if anyone is interested, orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ? I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]>wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..* P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
I'm planning to apply for a proposed scheme of CBPP-value indicator based on a cryptocurrency-like mechanism (Michel, I already described this to you, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, in another email thread). The idea is to create a universal (or not-so universal) denominator of value produced within different CBPP platforms, in order to facilitate productivity-assessment and comparison among these different platforms, as well as to provide a tool that would act as an interface between the CBPP (non-market) ecosystem and the commercial (market) system. I am working on this concept together with Isaac Mao (Social Brain Foundation) and a few other interested folks, it would be really great to have the P2P-F support this as well. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
dear primavera, let us know how you want to see this support materialized! just in case your approach would be compatible with the labor-oriented research I just outlined, would you be interested in joining them ? Michel On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]
wrote:
I'm planning to apply for a proposed scheme of CBPP-value indicator based on a cryptocurrency-like mechanism (Michel, I already described this to you, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, in another email thread). The idea is to create a universal (or not-so universal) denominator of value produced within different CBPP platforms, in order to facilitate productivity-assessment and comparison among these different platforms, as well as to provide a tool that would act as an interface between the CBPP (non-market) ecosystem and the commercial (market) system. I am working on this concept together with Isaac Mao (Social Brain Foundation) and a few other interested folks, it would be really great to have the P2P-F support this as well.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]
wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..* P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
I will draft the 2 pages document and share it with you, support probably just means "endorsement" at this point ;) but sure, I'd be happy to help out with the labor-oriented research as well, to the extent that it is compatible with the work I'm doing right now.. (which it partially is) On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>wrote:
dear primavera,
let us know how you want to see this support materialized!
just in case your approach would be compatible with the labor-oriented research I just outlined, would you be interested in joining them ?
Michel
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
I'm planning to apply for a proposed scheme of CBPP-value indicator based on a cryptocurrency-like mechanism (Michel, I already described this to you, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, in another email thread). The idea is to create a universal (or not-so universal) denominator of value produced within different CBPP platforms, in order to facilitate productivity-assessment and comparison among these different platforms, as well as to provide a tool that would act as an interface between the CBPP (non-market) ecosystem and the commercial (market) system. I am working on this concept together with Isaac Mao (Social Brain Foundation) and a few other interested folks, it would be really great to have the P2P-F support this as well.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Michel Bauwens < [email protected]> wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
ok, happy to endorse your excellent work, Michel On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]
wrote:
I will draft the 2 pages document and share it with you, support probably just means "endorsement" at this point ;) but sure, I'd be happy to help out with the labor-oriented research as well, to the extent that it is compatible with the work I'm doing right now.. (which it partially is)
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]
wrote:
dear primavera,
let us know how you want to see this support materialized!
just in case your approach would be compatible with the labor-oriented research I just outlined, would you be interested in joining them ?
Michel
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
I'm planning to apply for a proposed scheme of CBPP-value indicator based on a cryptocurrency-like mechanism (Michel, I already described this to you, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, in another email thread). The idea is to create a universal (or not-so universal) denominator of value produced within different CBPP platforms, in order to facilitate productivity-assessment and comparison among these different platforms, as well as to provide a tool that would act as an interface between the CBPP (non-market) ecosystem and the commercial (market) system. I am working on this concept together with Isaac Mao (Social Brain Foundation) and a few other interested folks, it would be really great to have the P2P-F support this as well.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Michel Bauwens < [email protected]> wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..* P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
Hello all, Not sure if I've actually posted on this list yet (but I do already know some of you off-list and I'm editing a special edition of the Journal of Peer Production - so plenty of overlap!). Anyway, myself and colleagues at Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia have been looking at practices of sharing and some of the legal barriers/hindrances to doing so, particularly in the context of the 3D printing community (one of the big barriers of course is intellectual property norms). Some of this feeds into discussions around digital labo(u)r - esp since these sharing norms have been co-opted by big corps which monetise them... If you'd be interested in my/our involvement, let me know. Angela ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> Sent: 20 May 2014 05:44 To: Primavera De Filippi Cc: P2P-F Community Dev; p2p-foundation; james burke; Daniel Araya; Trebor Scholz Subject: Re: [P2P-F] [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" ok, happy to endorse your excellent work, Michel On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I will draft the 2 pages document and share it with you, support probably just means "endorsement" at this point ;) but sure, I'd be happy to help out with the labor-oriented research as well, to the extent that it is compatible with the work I'm doing right now.. (which it partially is) On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: dear primavera, let us know how you want to see this support materialized! just in case your approach would be compatible with the labor-oriented research I just outlined, would you be interested in joining them ? Michel On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I'm planning to apply for a proposed scheme of CBPP-value indicator based on a cryptocurrency-like mechanism (Michel, I already described this to you, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, in another email thread). The idea is to create a universal (or not-so universal) denominator of value produced within different CBPP platforms, in order to facilitate productivity-assessment and comparison among these different platforms, as well as to provide a tool that would act as an interface between the CBPP (non-market) ecosystem and the commercial (market) system. I am working on this concept together with Isaac Mao (Social Brain Foundation) and a few other interested folks, it would be really great to have the P2P-F support this as well. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium, I would focus this one on labor issues, let me know if anyone is interested, orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ? I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below: ----- Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014 OVERVIEW A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries. These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks. Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as: System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time? Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents? Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources? Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect? Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience? Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled? Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes? Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge? MONETARY AWARDS We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution. ELIGIBILITY We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis. To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements. Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States. SUBMISSION PROCESS FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information. To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the following basic information: Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only. SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded. All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications. CONDITIONS Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects. FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication. ORGANIZERS This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as: Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School. ---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list. Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted. -- Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc .. P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/ -- Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc .. P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/ -- Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc .. P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
very interesting and timely Michel, I was intensely busy with preparing a workshop on digital labour organizing, i think partly relevant with this call. also involved in several relevant research-network mapping activity (see networkelabour.net). the workshop will take place this weekend in Berlin and it can be interest of people on the treat (see titanpad.com/digitallabourorganizing). I am reading the call with more care and will write more. o.
On 20 mei 2014, at 05:45, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected]> wrote: FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
thanks orsan On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Orsan <[email protected]> wrote:
very interesting and timely Michel, I was intensely busy with preparing a workshop on digital labour organizing, i think partly relevant with this call. also involved in several relevant research-network mapping activity (see networkelabour.net). the workshop will take place this weekend in Berlin and it can be interest of people on the treat (see titanpad.com/digitallabourorganizing). I am reading the call with more care and will write more. o.
On 20 mei 2014, at 05:45, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi < [email protected]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrés Monroy-Hernández <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected]>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution’s review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected]
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..* P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
Hello Michel, do you also need input from a legal researcher? I am working at the moment at the LSTS (Law, Science, Technology and Society) research group of the Brussels University (VUB). I think this is a project in which we can contribute. Legal discussions arise more often with these new forms of sharing platforms like Uber: when does participation in legal terms become labour, trade, ... and triggers the application of those legal frameworks. Question is then how these frameworks can be adapted in a balanced way, both to avoid it is used to evade legal protection for workers and to protect participants. I am personally interested to participate in this project. At the moment I am working on a project concerning big data and open data, but I have also done work on labour law and privacy/data protection. Best wishes, Hans Lammerant On 2014-05-20 05:45, Michel Bauwens wrote:
This seems like a project that would be ideal for a p2p-f supported consortium,
I would focus this one on labor issues,
let me know if anyone is interested,
orsan / phoebe / trebor: any interest in working with us on this ?
I would be interested in adding a part on studying the potential of counter-economies in the vein of the proposals that we have been circulating ; and on the emerging p2p solidarity mechanisms that could improve the conditions of labor in this context
here is my key proposal: 1) what effect is the sharing economy having on labor and work 2) can we imagine new solidarity mechanisms to re-balance the negative effects 3) can we re-imagine a new type of economic logic that would altogether transcend the structural problems caused to labor by the for-profit sharing economy
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Primavera De Filippi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Andrés Monroy-Hernández* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [berkmanfriends] looking for academics studying the "Sharing Economy" To: Berkman Friends <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Hello again, Berkman Friends. To follow up on this, I want to share this RFP to fund people to do research on this topic. Please help me spread the word! Deadline: June 6. Two-page proposal. Up to $100K. More info at http://fuse.microsoft.com/research/award or see below:
-----
Request for Proposals - Peer Economy Research Awards SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
RFP released: May 19, 2014 Two-page proposal submission deadline: June 6, 2014 Notification of results: Mid June, 2014
OVERVIEW
A number of technological platforms, often referred to as the "sharing economy," are disrupting entrenched industries by enabling ordinary people to monetize excess resources such as cars, bedrooms, and skills. For instance, Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit have challenged the status-quo in the hospitality, transportation, and staffing industries.
These platforms have the potential to create extra income opportunities for people, reduce the environmental cost of ownership, and foster interactions among co-located residents. At the same time, they challenge existing business practices, some of which were originally intended to protect public safety, health, and labor rights, among others. More broadly, the term "sharing economy" is in need for examination as these platforms most often involve the monetization of transactions that otherwise could have occurred in reciprocity networks.
Despite the Peer Economy's increased visibility, size, and tensions, not much independent academic research has been done in this space. We are seeking to fund academic researchers who can investigate and problematize this phenomenon, especially in urban environments where they thrive, to answer questions such as:
System Design. What sociotechnical tools or design interventions could help address or examine existing limitations of peer economy platforms? How might reputation systems be leveraged in new ways to recruit and engage communities of practice, to increase accountability and quality of labor? How could mentorship systems be leveraged to improve providers of labor over time?
Urbanism. What are the impacts of generalized "ride sharing," space rentals, and other forms of collaborative consumption in the lives of city residents?
Economics. What are the economic impacts of different peer economy platforms across industries? What sort of industries are susceptible to disruption by peer economy platforms and in what ways? Can the peer economy be accessible to communities who may not have access to high value capital or excess resources?
Altruism. How is altruistic sharing impacted by the introduction of peer economy platforms? Is there a crowding out effect?
Regulation. What is the role of governmental and other forms of regulation in the peer economy? Infrastructure. How do peer economy platforms enhance or undermine public infrastructure? How do these platforms impact communities' resilience?
Data. What data from peer economy platforms can be leveraged to help communities? How can individuals' privacy rights, societal benefits, and the platform's own interest be reconciled?
Environment. How does the peer economy change the nature of ownership? What are the environmental effects of these changes?
Labor issues. How are labor rights undermined or redefined by these new income earning modalities? What new structures for collective action might emerge from the peer economy providers? What jobs are being displaced by peer economy platforms and what alternatives might emerge?
MONETARY AWARDS
We will offer unrestricted gift awards totaling up to $100,000 USD, made payable to the applicant's institution.
ELIGIBILITY
We are especially welcoming of proposals that are cross-disciplinary. We recognize that the knowledge necessary to address this area may come from a wide range of methodologies and disciplines as diverse as computer science, urbanism, information science, sociology, design, legal studies, and economics. We welcome proposals that involve qualitative or quantitative data collection and analysis.
To be eligible, your institution and proposal must meet the following requirements.
Institutions must have access to the knowledge, resources, and skills necessary to carry out the proposed research. The receiving institution must agree that awards are made as unrestricted gifts, and should provide the necessary tax documents shortly after being notified of the award. Applicants may be faculty, researchers, students and affiliates of institutions that are either an accredited degree-granting university with a non-profit status or a research institution with non-profit status Proposals that are incomplete will be excluded from the selection process. Institutions can be located inside or outside the United States.
SUBMISSION PROCESS
FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research shall have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any submitted proposals. Therefore, proposals should not contain information that is confidential, restricted, or sensitive. FUSE Labs reserves the right to make the winning proposals publicly available, except those portions containing budgetary or personally identifiable information.
To be considered for this award, submit a CV, and a project proposal (2 pages) via email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> with the following basic information:
Description and approach. What set of questions will be addressed? How will they be addressed? What are the methodological and theoretical approaches that the researchers will utilize? Related research. Briefly summarize and explain how your proposal is going to build on previous work (references section are not counted towards the page limit). Budget and timeline. Describe how the award will be used, along with the milestones to measure the progress of the project. If the project described is part of a larger ongoing research program, estimate the time for completion of this project only.
SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
FUSE Labs reserves the right to fund winning proposals at an amount greater or lower than the amount requested, up to the stated maximum amount. We cannot provide individual feedback on proposals that are not funded.
All proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Addresses an important research question that, if answered, has the potential to have a impact on the peer economy. Potential for wide dissemination and use of knowledge, including specific plans for scholarly publications, public presentations, and white papers. Ability to complete the project including adequacy of resources available, reasonableness of timelines, and qualifications of identified contributors. Qualifications of principal investigator including previous history of work in the area, successful completion of previous funded projects, research or teaching awards, and publications.
CONDITIONS
Funded researchers must seek approval of their institution's review board for any work that involves human subjects.
FUSE Labs makes no claims on any of the data collected as a part of this research, but we encourage the researchers to publish their work broadly. Funded researchers do not need to seek FUSE Labs' approval prior to publication.
ORGANIZERS
This RFP is being coordinated by Andrés Monroy-Hernández, researcher in FUSE Labs at Microsoft Research. For more information please email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ABOUT FUSE RESEARCH AWARDS
Every year FUSE Labs helps fund university researchers doing work in areas related to social computing and design. Previous winners include faculty from departments of computer science, information science, and communications such as:
Prof. Michael Bernstein, Stanford University, Computer Science. Prof. Sean Munson, University of Washington, Human Centered Design & Engineering. Prof. Aaron Shaw, Northwestern University, School of Communication. Prof. Elizabeth Liddy and Anthony Rotolo, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Prof. Robert Mason, University of Washington, Information School.
---------- You are subscribed to the BerkmanFriends discussion list.
Mailing list options: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/info/berkmanfriends Mailing list members: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/review/berkmanfriends
Reminder: emails sent through this list are considered on-record unless otherwise noted.
-- *Please note an intrusion wiped out my inbox on February 8; I have no record of previous communication, proposals, etc ..*
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
participants (5)
-
Daly, Angela -
Hans Lammerant -
Michel Bauwens -
Orsan -
Primavera De Filippi