patrick,

can you explain 'closed loop'?

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com> wrote:
This hybrid approach uses Imputed Production at it's core
with optional funding from traditional Venture Capital.

----

* Potential users pre-pay to fund the purchase
 of land and capital to form a vertically integrated,
 permaculture based system we call a Production Aggregate.

* This Aggregate is a set of carefully chosen plants, animals
 and tools required to create the solutions needed by all
 of those workers such as food/drugs, shelter, cloth, soap,
 sanitation, health care, dental, eyes, etc.

* If a payer has skills needed by the Aggregate, they can
 contract to work somewhere within the Aggregate in exchange
 for the Aggregate supplying them with Products they need.

* Those workers receive co-ownership in the Aggregate in a
 form we call "Use Shares" which are similar to full co-
 ownership, but with some initial limitations on selling
 or renting those Tools or Products.

* Use Shares are used by the holder to prove that he has the
 right to use the Tools (limited by schedule) or consume some
 of the Products (limited by % of holdings within that Unit)
 of any restaurant, apartment, bus, hospital, etc. operating
 within the Aggregate.

* The workers do not buy products from the investors, but own
 those products already because of their Use Shares in the
 Aggregate awarded for commitments to Work or from commitments
 of Land or Capital.

* After some amount of time, or after some series of events
 the Use Shares should vest more fully to the payer to
 allow for selling and/or renting of those Sources or the
 Products of those Sources.

* Initial stages of development might have some workers living
 in mobile homes and eating food the Aggregate bought in bulk.

* Later, after the agriculture is installed and producing, the
 system will become "self hosted", being able to operate
 without requiring any external inputs.

* Soon afterward, the system will be producing surplus that can
 be sold to outsiders to collect Profit.

* If Venture Capitalists helped fund the operation, part of the
 Profit will be used as their ROI.

* We may want to distribute part of the Profit to the Workers,
 since that is a popular thing to do.

* We may we to distribute part of the Profit to random charities,
 since that is a popular thing to do.

* But we MUST handle some non-zero % of the Profits as though
 that overpayment were an investment from the payer.

* We should charge Profit during those sales, for if we don't
 collect the Profit, a middle-man will buy all that we offer
 at Cost, and then resell it for a Profit anyway...

* So we will charge Profit against the Payer, but we will also
 treat (at least part of) that magic value as Payer Investment.

* This causes these late-coming users to slowly gain ownership
 and therefore to eventually stop buying that product too.

* Similar to how the GNU GPL enforces Copyleft through Copyright,
 we propose to create a PropertyLeft document enforced through
 Property Rights used to apply this requirement to the Aggregate.

* This social contract can be applied by co-owners of any
 material assets to insure freedom for all users.

* Notice this is also a literal form of Insurance.

* These users must cover all the real cost of production
 just as any owners do, but they do not buy the product
 since they own it already - and they don't sell the
 product because they need to use it directly.

* The product is not traded unless there is surplus, and
 in that case the Payer must cover all the Costs of that
 production so the owner of Sources can be compensated
 for paying when they didn't need to...

* The Payer will usually also pay Profit, according to how
 much the "market will bear".  Some % of that overpayment
 must be treated as an investment from that payer so the
 growth of the Aggregate is incrementally autodistributed
 to all those willing to pay for that growth.

* At some point, and under certain constraints, and mostly
 to resolve disputes, subgroups must finally be allowed to
 fork from the rest while retaining property ownership.

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation



--
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens