I point the issue so as to solve it, not throwing things out.
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:Traditionally yes, but Crowd-Funding is reducing this dependency.
> need exterior investment from someone that doesnt
> want the resulting product for personal use.
Crowd-Funding can be thought of as an interest-free loan repaid with product.
Though the approach I propose is more like Crowd-Ownership since the
micro-investors receive real co-ownership in the Physical Sources
instead of just a one-time payout of the Object(ive)s.
In the case where Crowd-Funding cannot meet our needs, we can treat
some non-zero percentage of Profit as Payer Investment while the rest
is used to pay the VC Angels or bankers.
I hope we can work on this iteratively, solving small issues such as
this along the way without throwing out the entire approach.
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
Sincerely yours,
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis