I point the issue so as to solve it, not throwing things out.

There are many projects  at which you can contribute:
engineer--> a)open source ecology: open sourcing and reducing the cost of hardware 
programmer--> b) value networks : programming a value accouting program to deal with peer production(many different people coordinating)
me right now -->c) provide an information system to consumers so that they become investors of the products they need. (reputation system)
programmer  -->d) ripple: creating a decentralized system of insurance for money.
programmer  -->e)creating an new  peer/open currency.
lawyer ---> f) Since the ownership of infrastructure will need to change according to the people using it, someone needs to find a structure that complies with the current laws 
in a way that noone could manage steal the infrastructure from its users.

I need to go back to work.

2013/2/5 Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com>
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> need exterior investment from someone that doesnt
> want the resulting product for personal use.

Traditionally yes, but Crowd-Funding is reducing this dependency.

Crowd-Funding can be thought of as an interest-free loan repaid with product.

Though the approach I propose is more like Crowd-Ownership since the
micro-investors receive real co-ownership in the Physical Sources
instead of just a one-time payout of the Object(ive)s.


In the case where Crowd-Funding cannot meet our needs, we can treat
some non-zero percentage of Profit as Payer Investment while the rest
is used to pay the VC Angels or bankers.


I hope we can work on this iteratively, solving small issues such as
this along the way without throwing out the entire approach.

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation



--

Sincerely yours, 
     Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis