Hi Julie :Please post this on our daily RSS feed and on our Earth Systems Science , Reforming Global Finance and SRI News pages, thanks,
Hazel
HAZEL HENDERSON, D.Sc.Hon., FRSA
President, Ethical Markets Media; Author, Mapping the Global Transition to the Solar Age
Hazel.Henderson@
ethicalmarkets.com
Watch our TV series on EthicalMarkets.tv and available for global distribution at Films.com.
Sign our Pledge at www.ethicmarkgems.com to never purchase mined gems!
Read the 2017 Green Transition Scoreboard® report and watch the 3-intro video.
Ethical Markets Media (USA & Brazil)
St. Augustine, FL 32084 904.829.3140
EthicalMarkets.com, HazelHenderson.com
EthicalMarkets.tv, EthicalBiomimicryFinance.com
From: Hazel Henderson
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 8:47 AM
To: Hazel Henderson <hazel.henderson@ethicalmarkets.com >
Subject: Emailing: US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate -- ScienceDaily.htm
Your source for the latest research news
Mobile Follow Subscribe
- Extreme Jupiter Weather and Magnetic Fields
- Why Sumatra Earthquake Was So Severe
- Significant Potential for U.S. Nuclear Disaster
- Collapsing Star Gives Birth to a Black Hole
- Strange Quantum Property Turns On and Off
- Jupiter: Surprisingly Exotic
- Bus-Sized Fossil Marine Reptile
- Monkeys Learn to Call Like Babies Learn to ...
- Hunter-Gatherers and Farmers Intimately Linked
- Two-Headed Worms Coded for Regeneration
Follow all of ScienceDaily's latest research news and top science headlines!
Science News
from research organizations
US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster
Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate
Date:
May 25, 2017
Source:
Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
Summary:
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission relied on faulty analysis to justify its refusal to adopt a critical measure for protecting Americans from nuclear-waste fires at dozens of reactor sites around the country, according to a recent article. Radioactivity from such a fire could force approximately 8 million people to relocate and result in $2 trillion in damages.
Share:
FULL STORY
This image captures the spread of radioactivity from a hypothetical fire in a high-density spent-fuel pool at the Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. Based on the guidance from the US Environmental Protection Agency and the experience from the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents, populations in the red and orange areas would have to be relocated for many years, and many in the yellow area would relocate voluntarily. In this scenario, which is based on real weather patterns that occurred in July 2015, four major cities would be contaminated (New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, D.C.), resulting in the displacement of millions of people.
Credit: Photo courtesy of Michael Schoeppner, Princeton University, Program on Science and Global Security
This image captures the spread of radioactivity from a hypothetical fire in a high-density spent-fuel pool at the Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. Based on the guidance from the US Environmental Protection Agency and the experience from the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents, populations in the red and orange areas would have to be relocated for many years, and many in the yellow area would relocate voluntarily. In this scenario, which is based on real weather patterns that occurred in July 2015, four major cities would be contaminated (New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, D.C.), resulting in the displacement of millions of people.
Credit: Photo courtesy of Michael Schoeppner, Princeton University, Program on Science and Global Security
Close
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relied on faulty analysis to justify its refusal to adopt a critical measure for protecting Americans from the occurrence of a catastrophic nuclear-waste fire at any one of dozens of reactor sites around the country, according to an article in the May 26 issue of Science magazine. Fallout from such a fire could be considerably larger than the radioactive emissions from the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan.
Published by researchers from Princeton University and the Union of Concerned Scientists, the article argues that NRC inaction leaves the public at high risk from fires in spent-nuclear-fuel cooling pools at reactor sites. The pools -- water-filled basins that store and cool used radioactive fuel rods -- are so densely packed with nuclear waste that a fire could release enough radioactive material to contaminate an area twice the size of New Jersey. On average, radioactivity from such an accident could force approximately 8 million people to relocate and result in $2 trillion in damages.
These catastrophic consequences, which could be triggered by a large earthquake or a terrorist attack, could be largely avoided by regulatory measures that the NRC refuses to implement. Using a biased regulatory analysis, the agency excluded the possibility of an act of terrorism as well as the potential for damage from a fire beyond 50 miles of a plant. Failing to account for these and other factors led the NRC to significantly underestimate the destruction such a disaster could cause.
"The NRC has been pressured by the nuclear industry, directly and through Congress, to low-ball the potential consequences of a fire because of concerns that increased costs could result in shutting down more nuclear power plants," said paper co-author Frank von Hippel, a senior research physicist at Princeton's Program on Science and Global Security (SGS), based at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. "Unfortunately, if there is no public outcry about this dangerous situation, the NRC will continue to bend to the industry's wishes."
Von Hippel's co-authors are Michael Schoeppner, a former postdoctoral researcher at Princeton's SGS, and Edwin Lyman, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Spent-fuel pools were brought into the spotlight following the March 2011 nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan. A 9.0-magnitude earthquake caused a tsunami that struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, disabling the electrical systems necessary for cooling the reactor cores. This led to core meltdowns at three of the six reactors at the facility, hydrogen explosions, and a release of radioactive material.
"The Fukushima accident could have been a hundred times worse had there been a loss of the water covering the spent fuel in pools associated with each reactor," von Hippel said. "That almost happened at Fukushima in Unit 4."
In the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster, the NRC considered proposals for new safety requirements at U.S. plants. One was a measure prohibiting plant owners from densely packing spent-fuel pools, requiring them to expedite transfer of all spent fuel that has cooled in pools for at least five years to dry storage casks, which are inherently safer. Densely packed pools are highly vulnerable to catching fire and releasing huge amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere.
The NRC analysis found that a fire in a spent-fuel pool at an average nuclear reactor site would cause $125 billion in damages, while expedited transfer of spent fuel to dry casks could reduce radioactive releases from pool fires by 99 percent. However, the agency decided the possibility of such a fire is so unlikely that it could not justify requiring plant owners to pay the estimated cost of $50 million per pool.
The NRC cost-benefit analysis assumed there would be no consequences from radioactive contamination beyond 50 miles from a fire. It also assumed that all contaminated areas could be effectively cleaned up within a year. Both of these assumptions are inconsistent with experience after the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
In two previous articles, von Hippel and Schoeppner released figures that correct for these and other errors and omissions. They found that millions of residents in surrounding communities would have to relocate for years, resulting in total damages of $2 trillion -- nearly 20 times the NRC's result. Considering the nuclear industry is only legally liable for $13.6 billion, thanks to the Price Anderson Act of 1957, U.S. taxpayers would have to cover the remaining costs.
The authors point out that if the NRC does not take action to reduce this danger, Congress has the authority to fix the problem. Moreover, the authors suggest that states that provide subsidies to uneconomical nuclear reactors within their borders could also play a constructive role by making those subsidies available only for plants that agreed to carry out expedited transfer of spent fuel.
"In far too many instances, the NRC has used flawed analysis to justify inaction, leaving millions of Americans at risk of a radiological release that could contaminate their homes and destroy their livelihoods," said Lyman. "It is time for the NRC to employ sound science and common-sense policy judgments in its decision-making process."
Story Source:
Materials provided by Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Original written by B. Rose Kelly. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
1. Frank Von Hippel, Michael Schoeppner and Edwin Lyman. Nuclear safety regulation in the post-Fukushima era. Science, 2017
Cite This Page:
Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. "US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster: Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 25 May 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com/
releases/2017/05/170525141544. >.htm Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. (2017, May 25). US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster: Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 26, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/
2017/05/170525141544.htm Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. "US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster: Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/
2017/05/170525141544.htm (accessed May 26, 2017).
RELATED STORIES
Can Radioactive Waste Be Immobilized in Glass for Millions of Years?
Nov. 3, 2016 — How do you handle nuclear waste that will be radioactive for millions of years, keeping it from harming people and the environment? It isn’t easy, but a researcher has discovered ways to immobilize ... read more
Researchers Crack 50-Year-Old Nuclear Waste Problem, Make Storage Safer
Mar. 16, 2016 — Researchers have adapted a technology developed for solar energy in order to selectively remove one of the trickiest and most-difficult-to-remove elements in nuclear waste pools across the country, ... read more
High Flux Isotope Reactor Named Nuclear Historic Landmark
Sep. 11, 2014 — The High Flux Isotope Reactor, or HFIR, has been designated a Nuclear Historic Landmark by the American Nuclear Society. The reactor was conceived in the late 1950s as a production reactor to meet ... read more
CASL Milestone Validates Reactor Model Using TVA Data
July 10, 2013 — Today, the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) announced that its scientists have successfully completed the first full-scale simulation of an operating nuclear reactor. ... read more
Print Email Share
Most Popular
this week
Climate Stabilization: Planting Trees Cannot Replace Cutting Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Traffic-Related Air Pollution Linked to DNA Damage in Children
New Bedford Harbor Identified as Major Source of Airborne PCBs
Deaths from Chagas Disease Under-Reported
Personality Factors Are Best Defense Against Losing Your Job to a Robot
Largest Known Prime Number Discovered; Has 17,425,170 Digits
New Genetic Roots for Intelligence Discovered
Amazingly Flexible: Learning to Read in Your 30s Profoundly Transforms the Brain
Deep Sleep Maintains the Learning Efficiency of the Brain
'Could My Child Have Autism?' Ten Signs of Possible Autism-Related Delays in 6 To 12-Month-Old Children
Strange & Offbeat
Scientists Borrow from Electronics to Build Circuits in Living Cells
Increased Protection of World's National Animal Symbols Needed, Suggests Study
Building a Better 'Bot': Artificial Intelligence Helps Human Groups
We Buy What We Grasp: How Our Hands Lead Us to Choose Certain Products
Free Subscriptions
Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:
Follow Us
Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks:
Mobile Apps
Get the latest news from ScienceDaily via our free mobile apps, available for download on the following platforms:
Have Feedback?
Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
About This Site | Editorial Staff | Awards & Reviews | Contribute | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use links
Copyright 2017 ScienceDaily or by third parties, where indicated. All rights controlled by their respective owners.
Content on this website is for information only. It is not intended to provide medical or other professional advice.
Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily, its staff, its contributors, or its partners.
Electronically
Picking Your Brain -- For Market Research
New
Twist on Sofa Problem That Stumped Mathematicians and Furniture Movers
Now
You Can 'Build Your Own' Bio-Bot
No
Dream: Electric Brain Stimulation During Sleep Can Boost Memory--
Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/