I’m not disappearing-just too many mails-too much time. I want to
concentrate on areas where there might be productive outcomes.
Thanks for your reply.
hi
Natalie,
I think it is probably true that a certain type of
libertarianism is pretty much unusual in our p2p circles, and that certain gut
reactions would make you uncomfortable; however, I for one appreciate the change
to get to know such perspectives better ...
Michel
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Natalie Golovin
<10natalie@cox.net>
wrote:
In a previous round of comments, someone said, “Let’s pack up this
discussion...(I think it was profits) I’ve spent a lot of time in
conversations that go nowhere, plus I get the feeling I’m an outlier, not
welcome by the general P2P group. Let’s not waste each others time. I would
like to stay connected, but will refrain from commenting on anything not
directly related to (1)How OWS and any other groups (Tea
Party-Libertarians-Paulistas, whomever) can work together to bring political
pressure on Govt, Quasi-Govt “partnerships’ & the financial industry to
undertake significant reforms beginning with a full audit of the FED.(2)
Rethinking the US aggressive regime-change oriented foreign policy &
defense conglomerate. I care very strongly about these issues and will gladly
work with anyone, regardless of whatever other opinions they hold, on anything
else.
_______________________________________________
P2P
Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
--
P2P Foundation:
http://p2pfoundation.net -
http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect:
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing
list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation