On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Dante-Gabryell Monson
<dante.monson@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship

> In the french page on the subject, they mention the etymology of "the one
> who talks",

Along the same general lines, can't "Imperator" be translated loosely
as "commander-in-chief"?  After his victory in the Civil War, Casear
didn't use any regular title.  He simply signed orders "Iulius Caesar,
Imperator."


Yes, indeed - it seems "Imperator" is a title given to "victorious generals when they return from a military campaign"

according to french wikipedia

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperator_(titre)

also interesting to note, when reading the english page of wikipedia,
that the title was used mostly in the "principate" and the "dominate" ( the last periods of the Roman "Empire"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperator

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominate

The Dominate was the "despotic" latter phase of government in the ancient Roman Empire from the conclusion of the Third Century Crisis of 235–284 until the formal date of the collapse of the Western Empire in AD 476.




--
Kevin Carson
Research Associate, Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org
Homebrew Industrial Revolution:  A Low-Overhead Manifesto
http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com
Desktop Regulatory State:  The Countervailing Power of Super-Empowered
Individuals http://desktopregulatorystate.wordpress.com
Organization Theory:  A Libertarian Perspective
http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/12/studies-in-anarchist-theory-of.html

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation