Thanks Robin,

the point you make about couchsurfing being a "corporation" - albeit with a B "certification" - and not a "benefit corporation", does make a big difference indeed,
so much so I feel like underlining it - quoting from the article you mention :

 http://charitylawyerblog.com/2011/01/15/b-corps-is-not-a-new-legal-form-by-keren-g-raz/#ixzz1XCmd10l9

"The key difference is that the law requires a third party assessment ( for a "Benefit Corporation"),
whereas B Corps is - only - 
a certification." 

...

"Why the difference is significant:

• One can be a B Corps and yet be incorporated legally as a C corporation, an LLC, even a sole proprietorship. In other words, a company can be certified as a B Corps without ever incorporating as a benefit corporation

• One can be a benefit corporation under Maryland law without being a B Corps. The Maryland law does not require that benefit corporations be certified as B Corps. Rather, it requires that benefit corporations’ social and environmental performance be assessed by an independent third party that makes publicly available or accessible the following information:

1. The factors considered when measuring the performance of a business;
2. The relative weightings of those factors; and
3. The identity of the persons who developed and control changes to the standard and the process by which those changes were made."



On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:28 PM, robin <robokow@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Michel Bauwens <michel@p2pfoundation.net> wrote:
>>> thanks Robin ...
>>>
>>> in theory, a B Corporation is not such a bad thing, no, as it is and remains
>>> dedicated to a social good?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know. I haven't researched much into this B-corp thing.
>
> Though there is something interesting here in my opinion, which is
> that CS will be employee-owned. But how this will relate to
> voting-power we don't know yet.
>
> The employees will have more voting power than the two investors, but
> how the division will be and how much they can vote for (if it is only
> the board or example) is publicly unkown.
>
> And we don't know either how the shares are distributed among the
> employees (equally among employees or not, etc).
>
> As always has been the case with Couchsurfing, there is more we don't
> know than what we do know :s

The 5-year sage of Couchsurfing purposely misinforming the community continues:
Couchsurfing: "This structure legally allows us to put our ideals
before our profits."
(try to read that sentence again).

And yet Couchsurfing is not even a registered Benefit Corp
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcorp), but still a normal C-corporation
http://www.bcorporation.net/index.cfm/fuseaction/company.report/ID/5e086197-f44e-4448-9519-5e35d5bde1e2

Corporate Structure: C Corporation
Ownership: Private

See als: B Corps is Not a New Legal Form
http://charitylawyerblog.com/2011/01/15/b-corps-is-not-a-new-legal-form-by-keren-g-raz/

See also the discussion on the CS-group
http://www.couchsurfing.org/group_read.html?gid=45507&post=10059584

Robin.


--
Life happens at the level of events, not of words

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation