yes, my take as well, by obscuring the extractive/generative distinction, this amounts to a dilution of the commons for the market,

Michel

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:05 PM, <jbquilligan3@charter.net> wrote:
I read this as an appeal for decentralized competitive markets.

-----------------------------------------

From: "Michel Bauwens"
To: "Research stream email of P2P Foundation", "Vasilis Kostakis", "p2p-foundation", "Tiberius Brastaviceanu", "Arthur Brock", "James Bernard Quilligan", "tiziana terranova", "Primavera De Filippi"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday July 5 2018 1:09:41AM
Subject: interesting article on DAO/Commons merger

http://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/11/2/26/htm

this fascinating and important article was recommended to me by Tibi

it liberally cites P2P Foundation work and is based on considering DAO's as commons-based organizations.

To my  interpretation, the lack of distinction between extractive and generative practices and entities, seems problematic as it seems to be based on the idea that DAO's are generically commons-based

Nevertheless, an interesting approach on how to use tokens inside 'collaborative markets' and how to protect those from the extraction by 'competitive markets'.

Tibi, your comments would be very welcome,




--
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens