hi Kevin,
I completely agree with your approach, which seems congruent with mine,
Michel
> I'm personally not suggesting that p2p people should create a political
> party, BUT, I do think that we should have bridges to the institutional
> world, and that includes a network of sympathetic politicians,
> so it's not about creating a p2p political party, but of meshworkingI think what you suggest is the optimal form of political
> political and non-political people around shared concerns wherever they can
> be active
participation. The first emphasis should be on building
counterinstitutions at the local level and taking advantage of the
potential offered by liberatory technologies to create spaces outside
of state/corporate control, as Sam writes here:
To the extent that we're involved in politics, it should be by
Instead, I am really focused on
>> providing plausible alternatives to food, energy, education,
>> technology and culture systems in our cities and communities, where
>> people can co-govern the resources, an collaborate with others in the
>> region who are doing the same.
developing informal friendly ties and networking with particular
individuals inside the party establishments, or by participating in ad
hoc issue-oriented pressure campaigns in coalition with groups like
EFF.
--
Kevin Carson
Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org
Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism
http://mutualist.blogspot.com
The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com
Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective
http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/12/studies-in-anarchist-theory-of.html
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation