On 17/07/2018 09:08, Michel Bauwens wrote:
what do people think of this narrative ?
It seems to me a welcome re-balancing of the stories many of us grew up with.
Denis

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: r kanth <involutegandhian@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: The West
To: Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004@gmail.com>





                                                                   The West

                                                              A View from Without*                                             

*Europeans has been , for centuries, a ruthless, aggressive  Empire, leastways as viewed by many of its  Non-European subjects: Can  such Empires  do good? It’s possible: but virtues achieved via vicious means may not be perceived/received  as such by its victims;  much like slaves, who might baulk, at being asked to consider  benign aspects -if any- of Slavery.

More importantly,  the glories of European achievements are all too well eulogized  by Europhiles, and fill libraries upon libraries, the subject matter of  legend and lore;  less so, criticisms of this kind, whence I feel  no compulsion to be ‘balanced’ in what I say. This is,  unabashedly, a Critique:  but  a verifiable one; neither specious,  nor casuistic.

And why do I articulate it? As in the  current, highly visible, struggles against racism and sexism, the historical  iniquities of Empire and Colonialism must be kept in focus: lest we forget. Of course, as a ‘Gandhian’ ( at least , in some regards) , forgiveness for such sins  is assumed, here,  as an article of faith, ipso facto: the tale being told with reason, not rancor.

 

                       

For at least four centuries, the world has lived/struggled under the European heel/harrow.

The latter  did not streak ahead of the former by virtue of its prowess in any field , but one:

War.

And genocide, wherever/whenever it was meet.

The primary, if not sole, motivation was - in summary abbreviation -  commerce.

It is so still: with finance and war the only  really robust, active agencies , today,  within the NATO ambit.

Amongst the European tribes – yes, tribes: it’s not just Africans and Native Americans who were tribal –the Anglo Normans pulled head of others (notably France and Spain and the Dutch: later, Germany, Italy, et. al.) , again largely  by virtue of their martial superiority.

At least in the first instance , this  intra-Euro superiority  of the Anglo-Normans did not stem from technology: naval technologies were , arguably, broadly similar between France , Spain , and England.

But, rather , I venture, from sheer valor , (i.e.,  readiness to die, take improbable risks,  for King and Country) , irrepressible aggressiveness, and  dogged, superhuman  persistence against,  often , impossible odds.

Unfathomable Heroism, even of the idiot kind (vide ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’) was a sort of a cachet.

A  taste, nay zeal,  for war, one might say,  unequalled by any -  other than  a few  martial tribes of North West of India, no less valiant, violent, and aggressive.

Lands , labors, minerals, and ideas/techniques were,  thereby, willy-nilly,  extracted/appropriated wherever/whenever possible: with resisting natives decimated  without ruth, or compunction.

Pirates and plunderers, in short.

*

Via such lofty means/ mechanisms, Europe, the poorest , least endowed of the continents ( imp. caveat:  Europe is NOT a continent, but rather a sub-continent like India)  amassed the enormous ‘wealth’ ( as  defined/understood  within  an EM calculus, that is)  it has now.

Now it is easy to see why the empires of India and China did not go about pillaging the  rest of the world.

They had resource blessings in abundance within their   own bounds, so much so that  in  the 17th century India and China  accounted , perhaps, for about 50% of world’s  GDP.

India (i.e., its  various empires,  in aggregate terms)  was fabulously wealthy: and  China was thriving.

Which is why  Europe –  with its chronic poverty/dearth of resources , specially specie - made a bee-line for it, like Senor Columbus,  buccaneer, pirate, and mass-murderer: to catastrophic effect.

In less than two centuries   of outright marauding,  the region  of India , home to amongst  the oldest continuous civilisations ( preceding Greece by thousands of years)  on the planet,  was reduced to its  beggarly ‘third world status’ , when the Brits  finally left , mid-century, after making their  due  , if quite forgettable, ‘contribution’ to the sub-continent.

Needless to add , the enrichment of Europe was related to the imposed destitution of the Non-European world.

Arguably, ancient India, long before  the European (so-called) ‘Enlightenment’,  made  contributions to  arts, science  and   philosophy not merely comparable to  pre-Enlightenment Europe , but  ineffably  superior, and far, far prior.

Yes,  to  note, purely  en passant,  but two indices, they had  something close to flushing toilets in  ancient Mohen Jo Daro: and calculus was invented not by Messrs. Newton and Leibniz,  but in India (Kerala),  from whence it travelled , unacknowledged , as  usual, to Europe (btw I use ‘India’ to refer to the original  civilization that inhabited the sub-continent,  not to the modern(ist) political entity that bears that name today), centuries later.

No , they won’t teach  that  bit of trivia (!) in most of the European world,  even in academe, like  so much else.

It doesn’t fit the narrative

In much the he same way,  Hegel described Africa, of his time, as at the very  ‘infancy’ of human history incapable of civilization: in effect denying that Egypt was a Black , Nubian , civilisation , a denial that racist Europe maintained late into the 20th century.

At any rate, most European languages ‘derive’ from Sanskrit, and the dominant ‘Christian’ ideational prepossession  of Europe today  - real or phony - also hails from India: Christianity , arguably, is an offshoot of Classical Buddhism, whose  mighty philosophical sweep extended from the Mediterranean to Japan,  in its heyday .

Of course, Europe swiftly  ‘modernized’ classical Christianity (after its ‘enlightenment’)  via the so-called ‘Reformation’ , to make  it ‘fit’ its zeal for capital accumulation (by repealing  various restrictions placed  upon it by  the Catholic  church, as, e.g.,  in Canon Law).

Interestingly, no major (or minor) religion ever evolved within Europe, unless  a heartfelt Mammon worship  is ascribed that status.

I happen to think that significant.

*

Once launched ,  and stabilized,   18th century on, commerce and industry , within European empires, expanded  (after their  own native, peasant populations  were suitably dispossessed) via technical and commercial innovations , even as more  conventional expropriations  from its colonies continued, enhanced ( as  to this day)

The Anglo-Normans pulled ahead of Europe  in  productive and military technologies, until their German cousins( eventually to be  , if only grudgingly acknowledged , world leaders, in such areas ) caught up , and surpassed them, by the end of the 19th century,  much to their chagrin.

The so-called ‘World’ Wars were no more than European Wars of Empire,  that dragged in the ‘world’ (Japan was the only Non-European empire to be so  involved, much like Ottoman Turkey, long prior).

This, of course,  is an imminent  possibility even now.

War is , and has ever  been, to European rulers both an  important amphetamine and  aphrodisiac, aside from being the lead activity/sector  for generations.

Indeed,  I would venture, if they had their will,  NATO would have branch offices in New Delhi, Beijing , Seoul, and Tokyo.

*

The origin of European Racism -  the clear scourge of our  times - lay  simply in their relatively facile domination of the world for centuries ( a casual review  of ancient Greeks - as  the great Martin Bernal notes -  who had much interaction with Eastern ideas , does not betray any overtly  racist ideology of superiority).

After all,  if you have subdued the peoples of this world ,  at nominal cost/effort , the belief may follow,  like the US,  in ‘manifest destiny’:  or, like Europe (and not merely amongst Nazis) ,  in   a ‘master race’ of ‘supermen’.

Of course,  the ‘cure’ for such pretensions  is the  turn of history itself: by any reckoning, China, India,  and Russia (perhaps in that order) are the emergent  ‘super powers’ of the future(again using Western indices).

And they will  indubitably tone down  any and all  fantasies  of white supremacy  - like Trump’s boast of making the US ‘great’ again -not by any direct action,  but by their very (countervailing) presence.

Thus does ambition check ambition, and diamond(s) cut diamond(s).

So,  Euro-Racism will , over time, succumb, harmlessly,  to   the  rank of petty chauvinisms that characterize(d) most so-called  ‘developed’ societies on this planet.

Genocide, also, will, as such,  will/might  gradually recede from history.

*

So,  can we  then conclude that all’s headed to the good here, despite the manifest  iniquities of our times?

No.

I fear not.

In fact, far from it.

The EM legacy is now wantonly embraced by the entire  world (including China, India , and Russia)., via generations  of overt regime change,  clandestine subversion, and  endless propaganda.

Whence we may well  have the same game on, as we do  at this time :  of  continuing,  untrammeled , societal and ecological destruction -  albeit,  with  brand new players.

As a curiosum, this was an outcome  at least partially- if not  entirely correctly -  foreseen by Marx in his final years (of a ‘socialist’ Europe undermined by an emergent ,  ‘capitalist’ Asia).

In effect, we are all Europeans (i.e., EuroModernists) now.

Doubtless,  as the ancient regime gradually  slips,  in its  economic  and political reach , it will turn to a hypertrophic enhancement of its military capability, a  fact already visible in our times.

Faltering  dragons may be more aggressive than normal ones.

But it will not prevail: save in  the  intent  (if any) to blow up a  world it can no longer rule.

Will it?

Remains to be seen.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, with unusual compunction,  in a relatively more circumscribed  era:

‘when I consider  there is a just god in heaven,   I tremble for the fate  of  my country’.

Of course: If he merely trembled then, might he not  be shuddering now?

I wonder.

                     R  E  F  E  R  E  N  C  E  S

Kanth, R.  Breaking with the Enlightenment, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997

_______   Farewell to Modernism, NY: Peter Lang, 2017

[©R.Kanth 2018]





--


_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list

Blog - http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net
Wiki - http://www.p2pfoundation.net

Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making a donation. Thank you for your support.
https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation

https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation