What does p2p "property", "governance" and "production" most relate to , in comparison to other ( historic ) movements ?
And what may people related to the p2pfoundation be supporting ?
Do we have access to a chart which compares each of these ?
And what "Laws" ( or absence of Laws ? ) would such p2p approaches support ?
A limit to the concentration of personal wealth ?
( or on any wealth at all, including businesses ? )
No moral person for corporations or any business entities ?
Such limits leading to the sale of property, maintaining prices lower and hindering any artificial scarcity on land and resources ?
///
Ownership of ones own basic means of production,
combined with cooperatively owned property and means of production ?
Distributism combined with Cooperative approaches ? ( see links below )
- How would this compare to Anarcho Syndicalist forms of governance, production and property ( absence of private property ? ).
- Or with Libertarian approaches ( in the US sense ).
Differing from Libertarian approaches by Putting a ( moral ? ) limit to private accumulation ? - feel free to correct based on your understanding of Libertarianism -
- How would it also differentiate with Technocrats and the Technocratic Movement ( and/or the Venus Project and the Zeitgeist Movement ).
///
Under such a system, most people would be able to earn a living without having to rely on the use of the property of others to do so. Examples of people earning a living in this way would be farmers who own their own land and related machinery, plumbers who own their own tools, software developers who own their own computer, etc.
The "cooperative" approach advances beyond this perspective to recognise that such property and equipment may be "co-owned" by local communities larger than a family, e.g., partners in a business.