I find there is an interesting contradiction in Curtis' editorial,

he criticises UK Uncut for refusing to acknowledge leadership in their group,

and at the end hails the ants that destroyed the Biosphere 2 experiment as an example of 'collective action'

yet, UK Uncut is collective action, and ants have no leaders ...

this makes his argumentation rather paradoxical, no?

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Kevin Flanagan <kev.flanagan@gmail.com> wrote:
How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means - Adam
Curtis - Guardian

When, in the 1920s, a botanist and a field marshal dreamed up rival
theories of nature and society, no one could have guessed their ideas
would influence the worldview of 70s hippies and 21st-century protest
movements. But their faith in self-regulating systems has a sinister
history

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/29/adam-curtis-ecosystems-tansley-smuts

Episode 1 of his current documentary is up on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX5jImWRREc

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation



--
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens