institutions and laws have a very long latency factor ...
consider that now the overall majority of all citizens, all age groups and democrats/republicans alike, are in favour of the legalization of marihuana .. yet it could still take decades before that happens
without willingness to accompany ignoring the law with an active struggle against it, the same will happen for copyright ..
Hi,
With respect to the point that copyright may not survive if not reformed ... a similar thought was expressed by Jessica Litman in "Digital Copyright" (2001) -- that's right, 10 years ago:
=============================================================
As I have watched the copyright wars intensify, however, it has seemed to me that consumers' widespread noncompliance offers a very real ray of hope. I don't expect large crowds of Napster-deprived citizens to rise up in civil disobedience against a law that they perceive as unjust–even in the post-Napster world, copyright will not be a hot issue. Instead, I expect that most people will continue to ignore a law written in barely comprehensible prose that makes no sense whatsoever from their point of view. . . People don't obey laws that they don't believe in. . .If a law is bad enough, even its proponents might be willing to abandon it in favor of a different law that seems more legitimate to the people it is intended to command.
=============================================================
All the best,
On 03/11/2011 02:36 PM, Michel Bauwens wrote:http://falkvinge.net/2011/03/11/radical-copyright-monopoly-reform-only-chance-for-copyright-to-survive-at-all/
(hi Chris, I'd like to reproduce this editorial in our blog as well, can you post-date it to march 21 ?)
--
ChaTo (Carlos Castillo) Connect: LinkedIn · Facebook · Twitter
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation