X-Account-Key: account6 X-Mozilla-Keys: Delivered-To: rosea.grammostola@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.113.73 with SMTP id z9cs71025fap; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.127.8 with SMTP id e8mr7841369fas.81.1237965417980; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si4565010fxm.102.2009.03.25.00.16.57; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bounce-debian-devel=rosea.grammostola=gmail.com@lists.debian.org designates 82.195.75.100 as permitted sender) client-ip=82.195.75.100; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bounce-debian-devel=rosea.grammostola=gmail.com@lists.debian.org designates 82.195.75.100 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bounce-debian-devel=rosea.grammostola=gmail.com@lists.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id ABEB213A5F22; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,LDO_WHITELIST, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 X-Original-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AC813A5F01 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id 14240-71 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:16:34 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 DSBL_ORG=ERR CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .rki. - helo: .m4-bn.bund. - helo-domain: .bund.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 , rate: -7 Received: from m4-bn.bund.de (m4-bn.bund.de [77.87.228.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2CC13A5EB8 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m4.mfw.bn.ivbb.bund.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m4-bn.bund.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2P7GJai004260 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:16:19 +0100 (CET) Received: (from localhost) by m4.mfw.bn.ivbb.bund.de (MSCAN) id 3/m4.mfw.bn.ivbb.bund.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Wed Mar 25 08:16:19 2009 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:16:04 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Tille X-X-Sender: tillea@wr-linux02 To: nescivi cc: Debian Developers Subject: Re: realtime kernel for Debian In-Reply-To: <200903242311.10783.nescivi@gmail.com> Message-Id: References: <200903242311.10783.nescivi@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2009 07:16:04.0458 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F2BF4A0:01C9AD19] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1499-5.6.1016-16540.005 X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.975100-8.000000-31 X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.879 tagged_above=3.6 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/248981 X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:16:50 +0000 (UTC) On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, nescivi wrote: > Given that there are several audio oriented distributions based on Debian > (e.g. 64studio and pure:dyne) that would benefit from this, and I am sure > their teams may be interested in helping to support it too. IMHO it makes perfectly sense to try to join forces with these Debian based distributions and try to comaintain a -rt kernel package together with these guys to ensure a solit maintenance inside Debian. > A lot of linux audio users build their own patched kernels, because they can't > get it from the distribution; So why don't these people try to go the right way (tm) and work on an official -rt kernel package? > and not all of them enjoy doing it. (I've kept > postponing it, but if I don't find one in a distro soon, I'll probably have > to... the current Ubuntu rt kernel seems to have some other issues I > believe... at least on 64bit...) One reason more to finally solve the problem in the source distribution to make sure that all derivers will profit from it. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org