some bugs still present in inaugural issue
Hello everyone, i just received an email via the STSGRAD mailing list in which Maurizio announces the inaugural issue of the journal. That's great news! Many kudos to all the people who worked to make this happen and especially Matthieu for coordinating the whole thing. on the flip side, it'd have been useful if, prior to announcing the issue, we had done a little testing to make sure there are no bugs left. Shortly after I received Maurizio's message, I went to the peerproduction website to check out my paper. and i found several glitches: -the (anonymous or eponymous) reviewers' feedback is missing from the review page And the PDF file has some flaws: -fig. 2.3 in p.3 is cropped in half and therefore only half of it is visible -the text alignment is justified till fig. 1 (in p.2) and then it becomes aligned to the left. I understand that the development of the peerproduction.net website has been a work in progress and the website is constantly enriched with more content, but in the future i think we should devote at least a week to testing the website before going live on the web. Best, g.
participants (1)
-
george dafermos