JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society
Dear friends and colleagues, I'm writing to inform you about the 'development status' of the JoPP special issue on the FLOK policy proposals. According to our original time-plan, the FLOK policy papers, which were the epicentre of the 'Buen Conocer summit' that we organised in Quito at the end of May, were to be revised and submitted to JoPP by June 31. However, the scope of the revisions turned out to be much larger than was originally anticipated. As a result, about half of the papers are still being revised. And so, Vasilis and I decided it would make sense to extend the deadline for the submission of manuscripts to Sep. 30. Consequently, the time-planning of the issue would have to be modified as follows: - deadline for the submission of papers: Sep 30 (was June 30) - end of peer review process: Nov. 30 (was Aug 30) - submission of revised papers: Dec. 30 (was Oct 30) - issue goes live on the web: Feb 2015 (was Dec. 2014) We're hoping this 'deviation' does not conflict with the planning of other JoPP issues. So, please let us know if you have any objections to the above time-plan. On a related note, we're looking for reviewers, so it'd be great if list members could help. The list of papers is as follows: 1. open educational resources 2. open science 3. open/free culture 4. biodiversity 5. sustainable agriculture 6. open, distributed manufacturing 7. distributed energy 8. public policy for a partner state 9. public policy for a social economy 10. social knowledge and the social economy 11. ICT & open government 12. free hardware 13. free software 14. connectivity 15. Ancestral knowledge 16. Territorial organisation of the knowledge economy So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop me a line. Best, -G.
Hi George, On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:04:22AM -0500, george dafermos wrote:
1. open educational resources 2. open science 13. free software [...] So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop me a line.
I'm available as a reviewer for the Free Software topic, and more marginally also for open science/ open education. I'd rather not get too many reviews though :), so maybe you can send me papers in these areas on which you need help and I will get back to you about those I think I can review (within the time frame you need). HTH, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Hello, I would be happy to help, but only between 10 Oct 30 Nov, should be enough time these are the areas (in order of confidence) that I could help with. 1> 2. open science 2> 3. open/free culture 1> 4. biodiversity 3> 5. sustainable agriculture 3> 15. Ancestral knowledge have a nice day sara
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi George, all @everyone: for those who want to do reviews maybe email George offlist so as to not bother those who do not like 'process' emails. I don't mind them myself but I remember people not being happy about too much technical stuff a while ago - though now that things are quieter it may be less of an issue? so I don't know argh shut up :-) Concerning the schedule, I think the plan is like this: july 14? - machine shops @maxigas: any news on that front? probably better to avoid releasing in August as many people in the Northern hemisphere are not paying attention as much so if you are not ready maybe delay till September? just a thought dec14/jan15 - law issue july 15 - feminism issue So your issue could slot in between - we would date it back maybe to jan so as to maintain a semblance of order in our release schedule? One thing I have been wondering about is: are you still planning to have a first issue describing the FLOK experiment "from the inside" and use that as a base to CFP for a second more critical / general issue about P2P and the state / government or are you grouping everything into one? Thanks for advising, cheers, Mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of george dafermos <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 19:04 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Cc: Vasilis Kostakis; David Vila Viñas Subject: [JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society Dear friends and colleagues, I'm writing to inform you about the 'development status' of the JoPP special issue on the FLOK policy proposals. According to our original time-plan, the FLOK policy papers, which were the epicentre of the 'Buen Conocer summit' that we organised in Quito at the end of May, were to be revised and submitted to JoPP by June 31. However, the scope of the revisions turned out to be much larger than was originally anticipated. As a result, about half of the papers are still being revised. And so, Vasilis and I decided it would make sense to extend the deadline for the submission of manuscripts to Sep. 30. Consequently, the time-planning of the issue would have to be modified as follows: - deadline for the submission of papers: Sep 30 (was June 30) - end of peer review process: Nov. 30 (was Aug 30) - submission of revised papers: Dec. 30 (was Oct 30) - issue goes live on the web: Feb 2015 (was Dec. 2014) We're hoping this 'deviation' does not conflict with the planning of other JoPP issues. So, please let us know if you have any objections to the above time-plan. On a related note, we're looking for reviewers, so it'd be great if list members could help. The list of papers is as follows: 1. open educational resources 2. open science 3. open/free culture 4. biodiversity 5. sustainable agriculture 6. open, distributed manufacturing 7. distributed energy 8. public policy for a partner state 9. public policy for a social economy 10. social knowledge and the social economy 11. ICT & open government 12. free hardware 13. free software 14. connectivity 15. Ancestral knowledge 16. Territorial organisation of the knowledge economy So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop me a line. Best, -G.
From: Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:21:37 +0000
Hi George, all
@everyone: for those who want to do reviews maybe email George offlist so as to not bother those who do not like 'process' emails. I don't mind them myself but I remember people not being happy about too much technical stuff a while ago - though now that things are quieter it may be less of an issue? so I don't know argh shut up :-)
Since the part of my life dedicated to jopp was allocated to the special issue i was not really able to contribute to the list as much as i'd wanted but i was happy to follow developments here. So please post.
Concerning the schedule, I think the plan is like this:
july 14? - machine shops
@maxigas: any news on that front? probably better to avoid releasing in August as many people in the Northern hemisphere are not paying attention as much so if you are not ready maybe delay till September? just a thought
Sorry about the signal silence on our side. We'd like to release imminently(tm). We missed the deadline we set for ourselves (to release at FAB10.org with a paper version) because we underestimated the workload this entails and we both organised a conference just before. Having followed FAB10 though we thought that the perspectives in the issue would have been much needed to bring into that discourse and they are both critical and constructive. Status is that we have all articles in almost final versions and we are putting together the editorial section now. This weekend we should be starting to upload content on the staging site to feel out how it works and break things. I agree with your concern with August -- I think next week we will be in a better position to judge.
dec14/jan15 - law issue
july 15 - feminism issue
So your issue could slot in between - we would date it back maybe to jan so as to maintain a semblance of order in our release schedule?
One thing I have been wondering about is: are you still planning to have a first issue describing the FLOK experiment "from the inside" and use that as a base to CFP for a second more critical / general issue about P2P and the state / government or are you grouping everything into one?
Thanks for advising,
cheers,
Mathieu
---------------------------------------------------------------- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of george dafermos <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 19:04 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Cc: Vasilis Kostakis; David Vila Viñas Subject: [JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society
Dear friends and colleagues,
I'm writing to inform you about the 'development status' of the JoPP special issue on the FLOK policy proposals. According to our original time-plan, the FLOK policy papers, which were the epicentre of the 'Buen Conocer summit' that we organised in Quito at the end of May, were to be revised and submitted to JoPP by June 31. However, the scope of the revisions turned out to be much larger than was originally anticipated. As a result, about half of the papers are still being revised. And so, Vasilis and I decided it would make sense to extend the deadline for the submission of manuscripts to Sep. 30. Consequently, the time-planning of the issue would have to be modified as follows:
- deadline for the submission of papers: Sep 30 (was June 30) - end of peer review process: Nov. 30 (was Aug 30) - submission of revised papers: Dec. 30 (was Oct 30) - issue goes live on the web: Feb 2015 (was Dec. 2014)
We're hoping this 'deviation' does not conflict with the planning of other JoPP issues. So, please let us know if you have any objections to the above time-plan.
On a related note, we're looking for reviewers, so it'd be great if list members could help. The list of papers is as follows:
1. open educational resources 2. open science 3. open/free culture 4. biodiversity 5. sustainable agriculture 6. open, distributed manufacturing 7. distributed energy 8. public policy for a partner state 9. public policy for a social economy 10. social knowledge and the social economy 11. ICT & open government 12. free hardware
i could do that.
13. free software 14. connectivity 15. Ancestral knowledge 16. Territorial organisation of the knowledge economy
So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop me a line.
Best, -G.
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://research.metatron.ai/ People the switches!
participants (5)
-
george dafermos -
Mathieu ONeil -
maxigas -
rasa＠inventati.org -
Stefano Zacchiroli