Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP update - May 2015
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks, Matthieu, for this update
I have two questions
(1) Are you in a position to summarize and comment on the reasons for changing the title of the Ecuadorian experiment issue?
Hi Peter! Well, it was never meant to be officially entitled so :-) Most importantly, the goal from the very beginning was to discuss the application of policies for the commons - and the principles underlying them - as something that extends well beyond any one country. -G.
(2) I am part of a COST action on the "dynamics of virtual work" ( http://dynamicsofvirtualwork.com/) -- I'd like to promote the "Peer production and paid labour" issue with Stefano Zacchiroli and Phoebe Moore in that group (there is a meeting 3-5 June to put that on the radar); so it would be perfect to have that call ready before 3 June
Best / Peter _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi Peter, all I am also part of the COST Action "dynamics of virtual work" though I have yet to make it to a meeting. We definitely want to connect to that network as there is a lot of interesting work being done there with Ursula Huws, a great lady. But as far as I am aware? they don't deal with P2P much. For example Ursula basically sees it as reinforcing existing class hierarchies (since only the wealthy can afford to produce commons for free) so this issue is intended to contribute to bringing those research communities closer together. We will endeavour to finalise the CFP before 3 June. cheers, Mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of george dafermos <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 20:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP update - May 2015 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks, Matthieu, for this update I have two questions (1) Are you in a position to summarize and comment on the reasons for changing the title of the Ecuadorian experiment issue? Hi Peter! Well, it was never meant to be officially entitled so :-) Most importantly, the goal from the very beginning was to discuss the application of policies for the commons - and the principles underlying them - as something that extends well beyond any one country. -G. (2) I am part of a COST action on the "dynamics of virtual work" (http://dynamicsofvirtualwork.com/) -- I'd like to promote the "Peer production and paid labour" issue with Stefano Zacchiroli and Phoebe Moore in that group (there is a meeting 3-5 June to put that on the radar); so it would be perfect to have that call ready before 3 June Best / Peter _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi Mathieu there is indeed a strong strand within that COST action on existing class discussions -- yet there are other researchers in the programme who actually deal with P2P (not only me), so there is hope to have a meaningful discussion ;) / Peter On 20 May 2015, at 15:49, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Peter, all
I am also part of the COST Action "dynamics of virtual work" though I have yet to make it to a meeting. We definitely want to connect to that network as there is a lot of interesting work being done there with Ursula Huws, a great lady. But as far as I am aware they don't deal with P2P much. For example Ursula basically sees it as reinforcing existing class hierarchies (since only the wealthy can afford to produce commons for free) so this issue is intended to contribute to bringing those research communities closer together. We will endeavour to finalise the CFP before 3 June.
cheers,
Mathieu From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of george dafermos <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 20:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP update - May 2015
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks, Matthieu, for this update
I have two questions
(1) Are you in a position to summarize and comment on the reasons for changing the title of the Ecuadorian experiment issue?
Hi Peter!
Well, it was never meant to be officially entitled so :-)
Most importantly, the goal from the very beginning was to discuss the application of policies for the commons - and the principles underlying them - as something that extends well beyond any one country.
-G.
(2) I am part of a COST action on the "dynamics of virtual work" (http://dynamicsofvirtualwork.com/) -- I'd like to promote the "Peer production and paid labour" issue with Stefano Zacchiroli and Phoebe Moore in that group (there is a meeting 3-5 June to put that on the radar); so it would be perfect to have that call ready before 3 June
Best / Peter _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hello! The Feminism and (Un)hacking email address ([email protected]) does not seem to be working anymore. When we use it, we do not get a message error, we simply do not get any of the messages sent to this address. Could someone look into this? Maybe it is link to the previous tech issue? Thanks for your help! Sophie
participants (4)
-
Dr. Peter Troxler -
george dafermos -
Mathieu ONeil -
stoopt