Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate? Cheers Steve On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in *Shima* may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected]; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]
wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the *dolce far niente* of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges ( APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. *Film Criticism* has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <(848)%20932-5923>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
Hi all Does everyone agree? Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Steve Collins <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Hi Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate? Cheers Steve On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Steve, all For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean? cheers Mathieu The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in Shima may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming). [...] Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 To: Steve Collins Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Hi Steve, all In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read): "Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain." cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Steve Collins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01 To: Mathieu ONeil Cc: Journal list; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P). Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP? On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Steve, all We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain". I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...? Others? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Steve Collins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 To: Mathieu ONeil Cc: Journal list; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Hi Mathieu What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work. I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ...<http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org<http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ... cheers steve On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, again To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the dolce far niente of the Northern summer, but, well... I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below. However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊 "Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application." =-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= <http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/> Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc] CHANGE TO => Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc] =-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= <http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/> How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications. CHANGE TO => How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production No article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP. JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications. =-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= cheers, Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 To: Journal list Subject: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Hi everyone Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Rhonda Marker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 To: Mathieu ONeil Cc: Rhonda Marker Subject: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Dear Dr. O’Neil, I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ. Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges. One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. Film Criticism has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader. Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Rhonda Marker Rhonda J. Marker Director of Shared User Services Rutgers University Libraries Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey p: 848-932-5923<tel:(848)%20932-5923> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X -- Dr Steve Collins Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D -- Dr Steve Collins Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D -- Dr Steve Collins Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
Hi Stefan, all Fine with me, and its what we have already though it occurs to me that maybe the fact that Public Domain is a CC licence and "the public domain" is a general concept may be confusing? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Steve Collins Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ [https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo-cc-heart-green.png]<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> Public domain - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ... Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ... Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de<http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160 _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
There is a FAQ which may answer your question? https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ Basically, I see not difference. IMHO CC0 is an explicit statement putting some work into PD, while PD also automatically applies to works falling out of copyright. Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi Stefan, all
Fine with me, and its what we have already though it occurs to me that maybe the fact that Public Domain is a CC licence and "the public domain" is a general concept may be confusing?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:13 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ...
Best, Stefan
Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de <http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
Hi Stefan, all But what about author rights? Big point raised by DOAJ -see trail below The proposed text (take from Shima journal) says: Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material
elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
How can the author retain rights if CC0 means no-one has copyright? Color me confused, cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 19:52 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production There is a FAQ which may answer your question? https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ CC0 FAQ - Creative Commons<https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ> wiki.creativecommons.org These FAQs contain information that you should familiarize yourself with before using CC0. The information provided below is not exhaustive – it may not cover ... Basically, I see not difference. IMHO CC0 is an explicit statement putting some work into PD, while PD also automatically applies to works falling out of copyright. Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi Stefan, all
Fine with me, and its what we have already though it occurs to me that maybe the fact that Public Domain is a CC licence and "the public domain" is a general concept may be confusing?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:13 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ [https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo-cc-heart-green.png]<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> [https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo-cc-heart-green.png]<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
[https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo-cc-heart-green.png]<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> Public domain - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ...
Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ...
Best, Stefan
Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de<http://www.meretz.de> <http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de<http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160 _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
First: I am not an expert. Shima has CC by-nc-nd, which means that the author retains rights. AFAIK, DOAJ does not require that rights have to retain with the autor. CC0 means that authors retain no rights, which conforms with the DOAJ. They only want to have "information about the copyright transfer", thus a text saying that by publishing the work under PD all copyrights are "transfered" to the PD by "waiving" the rights. But: There is a problem with different jurisdistions. In some countries waiver rights it is not legally possible. Then it is just a statement to the public. This f.i. is the case in Germany, but practically I didn't ever hear about problems. To be legally on the save side we could use CC by. Then everything remains within the copyright regime and authors retain rights. However, this is a less radical statement than PD. IMHO. Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 12:42 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi Stefan, all
But what about author rights? Big point raised by DOAJ -see trail below
The proposed text (take from Shima journal) says:
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material
elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
How can the author retain rights if CC0 means no-one has copyright?
Color me confused, cheers Mathieu ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 19:52 *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
There is a FAQ which may answer your question? https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ CC0 FAQ - Creative Commons <https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ> wiki.creativecommons.org These FAQs contain information that you should familiarize yourself with before using CC0. The information provided below is not exhaustive – it may not cover ...
Basically, I see not difference.
IMHO CC0 is an explicit statement putting some work into PD, while PD also automatically applies to works falling out of copyright.
Best, Stefan
Am 17.08.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi Stefan, all
Fine with me, and its what we have already though it occurs to me that maybe the fact that Public Domain is a CC licence and "the public domain" is a general concept may be confusing?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefan Meretz <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:13 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
<https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/>
Public domain - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/> creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
creativecommons.org Our licenses help authors keep and manage their copyright on terms they choose. Our public domain tools, on the other hand, enable authors and copyright owners who ...
Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ...
Understanding Free Cultural Works - Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/> creativecommons.org Creative Commons provides a range of licenses, each of which grants different rights to use the materials licensed under them. All of these licenses offer more ...
Best, Stefan
Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de <http://www.meretz.de> <http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de <http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
Dear all, I would advocate a CC-BY-NC-ND licence for the following reasons: - we ensure authors are properly attributed (ensuring the moral right rather than economic right) - we ensure that if the articles are reproduced, they are not done so in a modified form without seeking the authors' consent (again, ensuring the moral right to the integrity of the work) - we ensure that no-one can make a profit out of the articles Legally speaking, putting something into the 'public domain' before the expiry of the copyright term doesn't make a lot of sense. This is not an adequate situation, but we currently lack clear mechanisms to do this in a legal sense. Happy to talk about this more. Thanks, Angela -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Meretz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2017 6:14 PM To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list <[email protected]>; Steve Collins <[email protected]> Cc: Angela Daly <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
Hi Angela, all Thanks. This sounds good. Unless someone objects and more discussion is needed - let us say, within 72 hours of this message being posted on the list? - I will go ahead and make the changes. I will let DOAJ know and report to the list when the changes have been made. cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Angela Daly <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 19:12 To: Stefan Meretz; Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Steve Collins Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Dear all, I would advocate a CC-BY-NC-ND licence for the following reasons: - we ensure authors are properly attributed (ensuring the moral right rather than economic right) - we ensure that if the articles are reproduced, they are not done so in a modified form without seeking the authors' consent (again, ensuring the moral right to the integrity of the work) - we ensure that no-one can make a profit out of the articles Legally speaking, putting something into the 'public domain' before the expiry of the copyright term doesn't make a lot of sense. This is not an adequate situation, but we currently lack clear mechanisms to do this in a legal sense. Happy to talk about this more. Thanks, Angela -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Meretz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2017 6:14 PM To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list <[email protected]>; Steve Collins <[email protected]> Cc: Angela Daly <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production No. Why not stay with PD? Explicitly done via https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/ Or with any other free cultural work license: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/freeworks/ Best, Stefan Am 17.08.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
Hi all
Does everyone agree?
Also do we declare we use CCA-NC-etc like below?
cheers
Mathieu
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 17:48 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list; Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi
Yeah, that's it. I know that Shima is registered with DOAJ too and I assume that its text was acceptable so perhaps we can appropriate?
Cheers Steve
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 5:44 pm, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
For Shima they say the following (amongst many other things - some good ideas we could use, if we wanted) - is this what you mean?
cheers
Mathieu
The journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>. Articles accepted for publication in /Shima/ may be posted in open access repositories and/or on author’s personal research pages upon completion of the journal’s proofing processes in the form supplied to the authors (and identified as forthcoming).
[...]
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:38 *To:* Steve Collins *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Journal list
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Steve, all
In the black block at the bottom of every webpage it says on the right (in grey so quite hard to read):
"Journal of Peer Production - ISSN: 2213-5316 All the contents of this journal are in the public domain."
cheers Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 15:01
*To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Well, in my experience I've not heard of any uni enforcing its rights and restricting authors (I'm sure it's happened to someone, somewhere though :P).
Sorry Mathieu, I'm, a little unclear on what you meant by 'now it just says "all pubs in public domain"' - what says that? JoPP?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve, all
We had a lot of discussion about (c) in the beginning and adopted I think CC-BY-SA ? but now it just says "all pubs in public domain".
I guess we need to stay true to our free software roots somehow, so not sure about the uni/author nexus...?
Others?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Steve Collins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Journal list; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi Mathieu
What's JoPP's current arrangement with copyrights - is there a current arrangement? I'm guessing that authors don't agree to anything when they submit an article to JoPP. We'll need to implement something for the future - but also need to work on what to do with work that's already been published. To add complexity to the situation it's usual for universities to own the IP in academics' work.
I spoke to a colleague who manages an online journal that is registered with DOAJ, and their (c) statement is quite brief but might provide a template? http://shimajournal.org/index.php Publication Details - Shima: The International Journal of ... <http://shimajournal.org/index.php> shimajournal.org <http://shimajournal.org> Shima is a SCOPUS registered peer-refereed academic journal that is published twice a year in open access online form and has been registered with the Directory of ...
cheers steve
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, again
To help move things along here are the two places on the journal site where text could be amended. I realise some of you may be enjoying the /dolce far niente/of the Northern summer, but, well...
I've made the required changes to the low-hanging fruit i.e. article processing charges and open access [in bold] below.
However for this next requirement I am less certain; where exactly do we stand on author copyright? Steve and Angela, I'm looking at you! 😊
"Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application."
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/mission-statement/>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
CHANGE TO =>
Mission Statement The Journal of Peer Production (JoPP) seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production. We understand peer production as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks. Notable examples are the collaborative development of Free Software projects and of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Through the analysis of the forms, operations, and contradictions of peer producing communities in contemporary capitalist society, the journal aims to open up new perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change. *The Journal of Peer Production is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.* Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: [etc]
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
<http://peerproduction.net/about/submissions/>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
CHANGE TO =>
How to submit to the Journal of Peer Production *No article processing charges (APCs**) or article submission charges are required to publish in JoPP.* JoPP will be published twice a year. All scientific contributions will be peer reviewed. If you have a question about the suitability of your contribution to JoPP, please contact the editorial team by posting to the (not publicly archived) editorial team mailing list: jopp [dash] editorial [at] lists [dot] ourproject [dot] org Once papers have been accepted, it is the author’s responsibility to format them in accordance with our specifications.
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=
cheers, Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:44 *To:* Journal list *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Hi everyone
Response from DOAJ FYI. I guess we need to be more explicit in our language. Does anyone have thoughts on the below?
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Rhonda Marker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:24 *To:* Mathieu ONeil *Cc:* Rhonda Marker *Subject:* Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
Dear Dr. O’Neil,
I am one of the volunteer Associate Editors at Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). I am currently processing your application for Journal of Peer Production to be included in DOAJ.
Your application states that you do not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges. However, the link you gave where this information can be found does not mention APCs or submission charges. In order to be included in DOAJ, you must explicitly state that you do not have such charges.
One of the requirements for entry into DOAJ is that your journal website must include an open access statement. The link provided on the application, http://peerproduction.net/, does not have a statement. I would like to suggest that you take a look at some of the journals that are currently in DOAJ. /Film Criticism/ has a brief, clear statement about open access that also describes how readers can use the content: http://www.filmcriticismjournal.org/about.html Using such a statement would also fulfill another requirements for inclusion in DOAJ: stating your license or use terms for the reader.
Your application also stated that the author does not hold the copyright without restrictions, and does not retain publishing rights without restrictions. However, I could not find any information about the copyright transfer requirement, or an indication of the rights holder for a published paper. This signals a lack of transparency in the authoring and publishing process. If you send me a link where this information can be found, I can update your DOAJ application.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Rhonda Marker
Rhonda J. Marker
Director of Shared User Services
Rutgers University Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
p: 848-932-5923 <tel:%28848%29%20932-5923>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-816X
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
-- *Dr Steve Collins* Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University
P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Start here: www.meretz.de<http://www.meretz.de> OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160 _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:12:15AM +0000, Angela Daly wrote:
I would advocate a CC-BY-NC-ND licence for the following reasons:
Sorry, but I object. A journal like JoPP can't have anything short of a license that qualifies as Free Culture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Free_Cultural_Works#.22Free_cult... Anything more restrictive than that would fall short of the ethos of the journal (peer production!), in my humble opinion. (Also, we already had this discussion, if memory serves.) If we want to stay as liberal as possible, the best implementation of what is called public domain in some countries around the world is the CC0 license, already mentioned in this thread. If we want to encourage the further sharing of scientific works that might reuse papers published on JoPP, than CC-BY-SA 4.0 is the obvious choice. Regarding the risk of potential misrepresentation of thought works, CC-BY-SA already offers ample protections. No matter what the decision will be, a note of warning: you cannot *retroactively* stick a license on papers published on JoPP without consent by the individual authors. And for what is worth, personally, I would object to articles that have my name on it to be on JoPP with a NC/ND license (which is not a big deal, only a single article up to now). I already have enough articles published by "ordinary" publishing houses under very restrictive licenses, paywalls and what not. For my contributions to JoPP, I really want them to be free as in Free Culture. I'm sorry if I come out as party pooper here, but I really care about licensing choices. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Hi Zack, all This may be a silly question but I wonder if there is a difference between the moral rights (as Angela said) of the author of computer code which is reused and those of the author of thoughts/words? Is there more emotional attachment to words than code, so that while its OK to reuse and remix code without attribution to build something more efficient and elegant, this applies less to words? On one hand "detournement" (Debord) rejects all IP and all conception of authorship; on the other we are dealing with scientific / academic authors...? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 10:13 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:12:15AM +0000, Angela Daly wrote:
I would advocate a CC-BY-NC-ND licence for the following reasons:
Sorry, but I object. A journal like JoPP can't have anything short of a license that qualifies as Free Culture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Free_Cultural_Works#.22Free_cult... Anything more restrictive than that would fall short of the ethos of the journal (peer production!), in my humble opinion. (Also, we already had this discussion, if memory serves.) If we want to stay as liberal as possible, the best implementation of what is called public domain in some countries around the world is the CC0 license, already mentioned in this thread. If we want to encourage the further sharing of scientific works that might reuse papers published on JoPP, than CC-BY-SA 4.0 is the obvious choice. Regarding the risk of potential misrepresentation of thought works, CC-BY-SA already offers ample protections. No matter what the decision will be, a note of warning: you cannot *retroactively* stick a license on papers published on JoPP without consent by the individual authors. And for what is worth, personally, I would object to articles that have my name on it to be on JoPP with a NC/ND license (which is not a big deal, only a single article up to now). I already have enough articles published by "ordinary" publishing houses under very restrictive licenses, paywalls and what not. For my contributions to JoPP, I really want them to be free as in Free Culture. I'm sorry if I come out as party pooper here, but I really care about licensing choices. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
PS. To clarify the below was in reaction to the words on this page which say on one hand users can freely remix and modify (but then says also credit must be given and changes indicated so maybe all is well) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 10:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production Hi Zack, all This may be a silly question but I wonder if there is a difference between the moral rights (as Angela said) of the author of computer code which is reused and those of the author of thoughts/words? Is there more emotional attachment to words than code, so that while its OK to reuse and remix code without attribution to build something more efficient and elegant, this applies less to words? On one hand "detournement" (Debord) rejects all IP and all conception of authorship; on the other we are dealing with scientific / academic authors...? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 10:13 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:12:15AM +0000, Angela Daly wrote:
I would advocate a CC-BY-NC-ND licence for the following reasons:
Sorry, but I object. A journal like JoPP can't have anything short of a license that qualifies as Free Culture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Free_Cultural_Works#.22Free_cult... Anything more restrictive than that would fall short of the ethos of the journal (peer production!), in my humble opinion. (Also, we already had this discussion, if memory serves.) If we want to stay as liberal as possible, the best implementation of what is called public domain in some countries around the world is the CC0 license, already mentioned in this thread. If we want to encourage the further sharing of scientific works that might reuse papers published on JoPP, than CC-BY-SA 4.0 is the obvious choice. Regarding the risk of potential misrepresentation of thought works, CC-BY-SA already offers ample protections. No matter what the decision will be, a note of warning: you cannot *retroactively* stick a license on papers published on JoPP without consent by the individual authors. And for what is worth, personally, I would object to articles that have my name on it to be on JoPP with a NC/ND license (which is not a big deal, only a single article up to now). I already have enough articles published by "ordinary" publishing houses under very restrictive licenses, paywalls and what not. For my contributions to JoPP, I really want them to be free as in Free Culture. I'm sorry if I come out as party pooper here, but I really care about licensing choices. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:56:19AM +0000, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
This may be a silly question but I wonder if there is a difference between the moral rights (as Angela said) of the author of computer code which is reused and those of the author of thoughts/words?
Wikipedia --- words, not code --- license is CC-BY-SA. The whole Free Culture movement is not about code, even though it clearly got inspiration from it. Also, very high profile examples of open access journals that have adopted Free Culture licenses abound, e.g., - https://elifesciences.org/about/openness - https://www.plos.org/license - https://peerj.com/about/publications/ having a bottom up journal that has "peer production" in its name do anything short of that would be very weird. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Hi Zack, all OK, now I remember why I always try to stay out of license discussions.. :-) (FWIW: IMHO there is a big difference between massively multiple-authored WP and single or small-group authored research articles, but whatever.) To sum up: one license (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 AU) does not allow commercial use or derivatives (better for authors?), the other (CC BY 4.0) does (better for the Cause?) What do others think? cheers Mathieu ===================================================== KEY POINTS BELOW::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ===================================================== Angela argues for https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/au/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Australia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 AU) You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Non-Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Zack argues for https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. ________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 11:33 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:56:19AM +0000, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
This may be a silly question but I wonder if there is a difference between the moral rights (as Angela said) of the author of computer code which is reused and those of the author of thoughts/words?
Wikipedia --- words, not code --- license is CC-BY-SA. The whole Free Culture movement is not about code, even though it clearly got inspiration from it. Also, very high profile examples of open access journals that have adopted Free Culture licenses abound, e.g., - https://elifesciences.org/about/openness Openness | About | eLife<https://elifesciences.org/about/openness> elifesciences.org We believe that open access to research findings and associated data has the potential to revolutionise the scientific enterprise - https://www.plos.org/license License | PLOS<https://www.plos.org/license> www.plos.org Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article (e.g., Huntingtin Interacting Proteins Are Genetic Modifiers of Neurodegeneration. - https://peerj.com/about/publications/ PeerJ - About - Our Publications<https://peerj.com/about/publications/> peerj.com PeerJ is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, whilst PeerJ Preprints is a venue for rapid communication of results. having a bottom up journal that has "peer production" in its name do anything short of that would be very weird. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi all chiming in from the "docle far niente" on the license issue I am also very strongly opposed to restrictive licences as CC-BY-NC-ND which are in actual fact worse and more limiting than good old copyright. I've been trying to send this message for a while, but for some reasons my computer and my email account don't play nicely currently. So this might be reiterating a few statements made already If we want to go CC, then CC-BY or CC-BY-SA are the most sensible options. Wikipedia have chosen the CC-BY-SA license, where the SA element essentially keeps content free and discourages commercial use (by *removing* commercial protection). I do not concur with Angela that ND is needed for the integrity of the work, as integrity is already protected by copyright (to which a CC license is an addendum) I do not concur with Angela that NC is needed so "no-one can make a profit out of the articles" ... NC signals that we don't want that, but it does not protect. Furthermore, NC would prevent us from coming up with some scheme to rise money for server costs etc. (mind you: even fundraising is regarded as commercial in the interpretation of NC!) A public domain dedication (PD) is much more radical. Going public domain is more radical and could invite users to not attribute work -- whereas attribution (being cited) is one of the main "currencies" in the academic field. Creative Commons have developed the CC0 "dedication" to mark that a work is deliberately put into the public domain (most often used for open government data), and the PD, a mark to "certify" that something is in de public domain; see https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/. Angela is right that the public domain situation is legally unclear. I would personally prefer the CC-BY-SA license for the reasons stated above; second best is CC-BY Best / Peter Disclosure: I have worked for Creative Commons Netherlands in 2007-2009 and I am a founding member of the Communia association ( https://www.communia-association.org/) On 19 August 2017 at 04:50, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Zack, all
OK, now I remember why I always try to stay out of license discussions.. :-)
(FWIW: IMHO there is a big difference between massively multiple-authored WP and single or small-group authored research articles, but whatever.)
To sum up: one license (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 AU) does not allow commercial use or derivatives (better for authors?), the other (CC BY 4.0) does (better for the Cause?)
What do others think?
cheers
Mathieu
=====================================================
KEY POINTS BELOW::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::
=====================================================
Angela argues for https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/au/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Australia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 AU)
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Non-Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Zack argues for https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> *Sent:* Saturday, August 19, 2017 11:33 *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:56:19AM +0000, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
This may be a silly question but I wonder if there is a difference between the moral rights (as Angela said) of the author of computer code which is reused and those of the author of thoughts/words?
Wikipedia --- words, not code --- license is CC-BY-SA. The whole Free Culture movement is not about code, even though it clearly got inspiration from it.
Also, very high profile examples of open access journals that have adopted Free Culture licenses abound, e.g.,
- https://elifesciences.org/about/openness Openness | About | eLife <https://elifesciences.org/about/openness> elifesciences.org We believe that open access to research findings and associated data has the potential to revolutionise the scientific enterprise
- https://www.plos.org/license License | PLOS <https://www.plos.org/license> www.plos.org Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article (e.g., Huntingtin Interacting Proteins Are Genetic Modifiers of Neurodegeneration.
- https://peerj.com/about/publications/ PeerJ - About - Our Publications <https://peerj.com/about/publications/> peerj.com PeerJ is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, whilst PeerJ Preprints is a venue for rapid communication of results.
having a bottom up journal that has "peer production" in its name do anything short of that would be very weird.
Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
I completely agree with Stefano. I want to add an explanation to Mathieu: Am 19.08.2017 um 04:50 schrieb Mathieu ONeil:
To sum up: one license (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 AU) does not allow commercial use or derivatives (better for authors?), the other (CC BY 4.0) does (better for the Cause?)
If the purpose is to prevent commercial use and simultaneouly keep freedom of sharing, then CC BY-SA, the most restrictive free cultural license, is the best choice, NOT NC. Why? Share-alike means that the commercial user itself has to use SA which conficts with keeping content scarce to make money of it (especially when published offline). NC explicitly prevents commercial use but at the same time sharing in a lot of areas. And commercial use is a wide notion which applies to books as well as to blogs with adds on it. Concluding, I would prefer CC0, since I find commercial use okay beause it spreads content, and thats my aim. We live in capitalism, and thats the way it goes. Second best is CC-BY. Third would be CC BY-SA. Everything below that is neither useful nor acceptable - for me :-) Best, Stefan -- Start here: www.meretz.de OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
participants (6)
-
Angela Daly -
Mathieu ONeil -
Peter Troxler -
Stefan Meretz -
Stefano Zacchiroli -
Steve Collins