Given that the EOI and the CFP are using the same 'branding', it's probably better to leave editor emails if you want to preserve the distinction. steve On 27 November 2017 at 22:00, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:

Send JoPP-Public mailing list submissions to [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of JoPP-Public digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: JoPP "OPEN" (Mathieu ONeil)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:29:00 +0000 From: Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list <[email protected]> Cc: Steve Collins <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP "OPEN" Message-ID: <SY3PR01MB0940C9500123949470F20F2BC6250@SY3PR01MB0940. ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi Peter, all

We've uploaded the CFP/EOI to the website and generated the static file - hopefully it will be up soon. Will advise if any issues.

I was wondering if we should set up on [email protected] email address?

It's not clear whether this is a good idea as we have both an issue CFP and a more general EOI - so maybe leave as is i.e. editor emails for CFP and journal or ed list for EOI?

Once this is resolved we can start circulating the CFP / EOI.

cheers

Mathieu

________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]> on behalf of Peter Troxler <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2017 21:51 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP "OPEN"

"our website and our network of reviewers"?

On 20 November 2017 at 04:43, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]< mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Peter, all

'Do we nee to be more specific what “technical and intellectual infrastructure” means?'

Donno. I took it to mean "our website and reviewers". Maybe that would be clearer?

cheers

Mathieu

________________________________ From: JoPP-Public <[email protected]<mailto:jopp- [email protected]>> on behalf of Peter Troxler < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 0:51 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] JoPP "OPEN"

Hi all

I am in support of these calls.

I have a question regarding this sentence:

On 16 Nov 2017, at 02:13, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto: [email protected]>> wrote:

This means we are offering our technical and intellectual infrastructure to support the production and dissemination of activist or scientific interventions in the field of peer production.

Do we nee to be more specific what “technical and intellectual infrastructure” means?

Best, Peter

_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public