On 6 Oct 2016, at 06:35, george dafermos <georgedafermos@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au> wrote:

Hi all


It's been suggested to me that it would be useful to get JoPP some more institutional recognition. Does anyone have a clue about whether it would be desirable and / or advisable to get JoPP listed into Scopus or ThomsonReuters Web of Science? Scopus is run by Elsevier which is obvs not great and after a brief look on their site I could not find info on how to be indexed. On the other hand Thomson does indicate what their criteria for inclusion is:

http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process 


No doubt it would be nice to get some institutional recognition for JoPP. Personally I don't use neither of those resources anymore to look for bibliography, but I remember lots of people were using the web of science when i was doing my phd in delft. 

I wonder if we could get into WorldCat via a friendly university library ... ?


 

However they seem to have requirements which may be hard to meet - such as a DOI for each article...? is this a way to exclude non-corporate publications? Would pursuing this be a good idea? Do we need to revisit the idea of raising money for JoPP?


Hmmm...how much would it cost to get a DOI for each article? Does anyone know?

as per http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/20pub_fees.html
DOI is $275 per year plus $1 per record (volume, issue and article)

a cheaper route as suggested here https://www.martineve.com/2012/07/11/starting-an-open-access-journal-a-step-by-step-guide-part-2/ is membership of OASPA at €75 which includes 50 DOIs per year


 

Thoughts? 


cheers


Mathieu




_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public


_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public