Hi George, all

Well, as indicated by the emoji (?) "deadbeats" may be a bit strong. After all, we don't know for sure why they did not resubmit - they may have been sick for instance. So "interrupted" or "incomplete" or "uncompleted" may be less normative...?

cheers

Mathieu

---

From: jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org <jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <georgedafermos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 7:41
To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Broken page

 

A ha, I see. In that case, "deadbeats" shall be a fine name for that page :)

Lots of wishes for the New Year!

-G.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au> wrote:

Hi George

The page is in the peer review tree so not really pointing to issues. It was meant to list people who submitted to us then did not resubmit after reviews - so if they then submitted and published elsewhere our reviewers contribution would be documented at least.

So "current" is a bit misleading as these subs are old now - maybe rename it "deadbeats"? ;-)

Open to suggestions...

And happy new year to you and everyone else!

​cheers

Mathieu  

 

---

From: jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org <jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <georgedafermos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:49
To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
Subject: [JoPP-Public] Broken page

 

I am feeling there's something wrong with this page: http://peerproduction.net/peer-review/current/

Shouldn't that page be dedicated to the most recent issue of JoPP?

x,

g.

_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public

_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public