Hi Štěpán, On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Štěpán Němec wrote:

commit dbf7305dbde4737d73748ae31e724e722ef0ce34 Author: Stephen Bach <[email protected]> Date: Fri Jul 9 13:44:46 2010 -0400

For hideshow mode, don't hide all lines by default --- vimpulse-compatibility.el | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/vimpulse-compatibility.el b/vimpulse-compatibility.el index c2c59f0..9d0adae 100644 --- a/vimpulse-compatibility.el +++ b/vimpulse-compatibility.el @@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ (eval-after-load 'hideshow (hs-toggle-hiding) (hs-hide-level vimpulse-fold-level)) (defun vimpulse-hs-setup () - (hs-hide-all) (define-key viper-vi-basic-map "za" 'vimpulse-za) (define-key viper-vi-basic-map "zm" 'hs-hide-all) (define-key viper-vi-basic-map "zr" 'hs-show-all)

Why? Isn't that what Vim does, when you turn folding on? (It would have been nice to have the rationale in the commit message, providing there is one).

Only in files which are explicitly setup for folding.

I don't use hs-minor-mode, but a possible reason for this change I can think of is that it breaks existing Emacs user expectations, because the mode hook triggers the hiding unconditionally. Is that it?

Yes. If one wants to hide-all in every file, it's as easy as adding hs-hide-all to the same hook; anyone who's gone to the trouble of setting up hideshow should know how to do that. I think it's better if Vimpulse doesn't make a large assumption about how people use hideshow, an external package.