RV: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )
Aca va la presentacion en sociedad de la Internet(c) en la lista 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property' A ver si traduzco al frances para este fin de semana y lo mando tambien al grupo de la LAL Saludos - NAtxo -----Mensaje original----- De: I.R.Maturana [mailto:[email protected]] Enviado el: jueves, 31 de julio de 2003 22:27 Para: 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property' Asunto: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft ) Internet Specifications MAY have statutory force This thread made me thinking it would be plausible to write a RFC designed for licensing conventions. ======== Request For Comments: Internet(c) Declaration for Protected Works on Internet Syntax: <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PROTECTED|PRIVATE"> Human readable auto-generated declaration: Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work-as-published) All rights reserved in all countries. Summary: As a logical evolution of the Internet Technology this draft defines a Protected Scope on Internet. Authors who publish their Works on Internet under this Protected scope do allow copy, translation, and basic adaptation of their works, on Internet only. Outside the Internet scope, the Protected Works are considered Private works, with no prejudice on the Author's Private rights in all countries. This draft introduces a new META tag to allow filtering of Works, based on the end-user configuration of compliant software clients. An human readable Internet(c) Declaration is also proposed, and it may be auto-generated by compliant software clients. === Section 1: Internet Scope and Definitions On Internet scope: - PUBLIC sources are public domain sources and have universal scope; - PROTECTED sources are Works using the PROTECTED meta-tag or the Internet(c) declaration somewhere in the body. They have Internet-only scope; - PRIVATE sources are Works with a strict (c) declaration and have private-only scope. Outside Internet scope: - There is only 2 Work classes: PUBLIC or PRIVATE. - PROTECTED sources are defined as PRIVATE. === Section 2- Introducing a new specific META tag to HTML In the HEAD section: <meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PRoTECTED|PRIVATE"> - If this META tag does not appears, and if the Internet(c) string cannot be found in the BODY section of Work, then compliant software will assume that source Work is of class PRIVATE. - PUBLIC and PROTECTED sources MUST be copied by compliants servers or clients, based on Technology rules only. - PRIVATE sources MAY be copied compliants servers or clients, based on the specific end-user's configuration. === Section 3- Copyright declaration of Protected Works Based on the PROTECTED meta-tag, the following Internet(C) declarations MAY be auto-generated by compliant servers or clients. When the site URL and the work URL belong to same domain, the human-readable declaration MUST be: Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work) (URL of the work) All rights reserved in all countries. When the site URL and the Work URL do NOT belong to the same domain (that is: for all copies/translations/derivations) the human-readable declaration MUST be: Internet(c) (date) (owner of Web site/Directory Service) With Internet(c) license from (author-of-the-source-work) All rights reserved in all countries. .... etc, etc.. Voila my compliant signature: Internet(c) 2003 I.R.Maturana (http://internet-copyright.org) All rights reserved in all countries and all languages (I registered this URL 2 days ago :) Incredible: It was never registered as .ORG before ! !:-D)))) ======== I do not know if "using Internet" is an implied license. However, there is no need to ask authorization to apply the Internet Specifications like RFCs. And I am sure this kind of RFC would make sense for lawyers, on any country. :) I.R.Maturana -- http://www.in3activa.org (LPT-ESv1r3 - http://www.in3activa.org/doc/es/LPT-ES.html)
Pues enhorabuena. Se le puede dar difusión entiendo ¿no? Un fuerte saludo, Vicente El jue, 31-07-2003 a las 22:52, I.R.Maturana escribió:
Aca va la presentacion en sociedad de la Internet(c) en la lista 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property'
A ver si traduzco al frances para este fin de semana y lo mando tambien al grupo de la LAL
Saludos - NAtxo
-----Mensaje original----- De: I.R.Maturana [mailto:[email protected]] Enviado el: jueves, 31 de julio de 2003 22:27 Para: 'CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property' Asunto: Protected Scope for Internet(c) Works (was:Kelly v. Arriba Soft )
Internet Specifications MAY have statutory force This thread made me thinking it would be plausible to write a RFC designed for licensing conventions.
======== Request For Comments:
Internet(c) Declaration for Protected Works on Internet
Syntax:
<meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PROTECTED|PRIVATE">
Human readable auto-generated declaration:
Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work-as-published) All rights reserved in all countries.
Summary:
As a logical evolution of the Internet Technology this draft defines a Protected Scope on Internet.
Authors who publish their Works on Internet under this Protected scope do allow copy, translation, and basic adaptation of their works, on Internet only.
Outside the Internet scope, the Protected Works are considered Private works, with no prejudice on the Author's Private rights in all countries.
This draft introduces a new META tag to allow filtering of Works, based on the end-user configuration of compliant software clients.
An human readable Internet(c) Declaration is also proposed, and it may be auto-generated by compliant software clients.
=== Section 1: Internet Scope and Definitions
On Internet scope:
- PUBLIC sources are public domain sources and have universal scope;
- PROTECTED sources are Works using the PROTECTED meta-tag or the Internet(c) declaration somewhere in the body. They have Internet-only scope;
- PRIVATE sources are Works with a strict (c) declaration and have private-only scope.
Outside Internet scope:
- There is only 2 Work classes: PUBLIC or PRIVATE. - PROTECTED sources are defined as PRIVATE.
=== Section 2- Introducing a new specific META tag to HTML
In the HEAD section:
<meta name="copyright-scope" content="PUBLIC|PRoTECTED|PRIVATE">
- If this META tag does not appears, and if the Internet(c) string cannot be found in the BODY section of Work, then compliant software will assume that source Work is of class PRIVATE.
- PUBLIC and PROTECTED sources MUST be copied by compliants servers or clients, based on Technology rules only.
- PRIVATE sources MAY be copied compliants servers or clients, based on the specific end-user's configuration.
=== Section 3- Copyright declaration of Protected Works
Based on the PROTECTED meta-tag, the following Internet(C) declarations MAY be auto-generated by compliant servers or clients.
When the site URL and the work URL belong to same domain, the human-readable declaration MUST be:
Internet(c) (date) (author-of-the-work) (URL of the work) All rights reserved in all countries.
When the site URL and the Work URL do NOT belong to the same domain (that is: for all copies/translations/derivations) the human-readable declaration MUST be:
Internet(c) (date) (owner of Web site/Directory Service) With Internet(c) license from (author-of-the-source-work) All rights reserved in all countries.
.... etc, etc..
Voila my compliant signature:
Internet(c) 2003 I.R.Maturana (http://internet-copyright.org) All rights reserved in all countries and all languages
(I registered this URL 2 days ago :) Incredible: It was never registered as .ORG before ! !:-D))))
========
I do not know if "using Internet" is an implied license.
However, there is no need to ask authorization to apply the Internet Specifications like RFCs.
And I am sure this kind of RFC would make sense for lawyers, on any country. :)
I.R.Maturana -- http://www.in3activa.org (LPT-ESv1r3 - http://www.in3activa.org/doc/es/LPT-ES.html)
______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Copyvisuales-actitud mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/copyvisuales-actitud
Hola Vicente Sí, yo creo que la idea ya merece difundirse. http://www.internet-copyright.org (Si alguien quiere hacer un servicio, puedo redireccionar un dominio hacia el servicio). Siguiendo tu excelente sugerencia de los RFC, estoy preparando un Internet-Draft. No es ninguna estupidez. Primera versión (disimulada, porque son pruebas) en: www.internet-copyright/ps4icr.xml Estoy reescribiendo el índice. aunque mi nivel de inglés escrito sea cutre, será más fácil de difundir. Según avance, revisaré las FAQ y las traduciré al FR. Creo que sería necesario un trabajo "relacional", de alguien capaz de poner a la gente en relación para esta idea. Expertos en Redes, y otros en Derecho, para revisar o incluso firmar el RFC. Yo no valgo para eso. Cada vez me parezco más a Diógenes, el del tonel: -- "Quitate del sol", contestó, cuando Alejandro Magno le preguntó qué quería que hiciera por él. :) Saludos a todos, (¡a los presentes, y los que estén de vacaciones!) Natxo
Me parece todo bien, pero si hacemos un llamamiento, debe haber un foro, una lista de correo, o algo que pueda englobar o incluir a la gente que se acerque, o simplemente un correo de contacto. Si no es posible que se genere debate y que ni siquiera nos enteremos. Vamos que hay que abrir un canal claro de retroalimentación/feedback. Luego mandas un correo (medio oficial) de llamamiento a tu gusto, y empezamos a correr la voz. Estas cosas, se mueven con rapidez por Internet. Un fuerte Saludo, Vicente El mar, 05-08-2003 a las 09:17, I.R.Maturana escribió:
Hola Vicente
Sí, yo creo que la idea ya merece difundirse. http://www.internet-copyright.org (Si alguien quiere hacer un servicio, puedo redireccionar un dominio hacia el servicio).
Siguiendo tu excelente sugerencia de los RFC, estoy preparando un Internet-Draft. No es ninguna estupidez.
Primera versión (disimulada, porque son pruebas) en: www.internet-copyright/ps4icr.xml Estoy reescribiendo el índice. aunque mi nivel de inglés escrito sea cutre, será más fácil de difundir.
Según avance, revisaré las FAQ y las traduciré al FR.
Creo que sería necesario un trabajo "relacional", de alguien capaz de poner a la gente en relación para esta idea. Expertos en Redes, y otros en Derecho, para revisar o incluso firmar el RFC.
Yo no valgo para eso. Cada vez me parezco más a Diógenes, el del tonel: -- "Quitate del sol", contestó, cuando Alejandro Magno le preguntó qué quería que hiciera por él. :)
Saludos a todos, (¡a los presentes, y los que estén de vacaciones!) Natxo
-- Vicente Ruiz | gpg --recv-keys --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net 9E358A05 http://ourproject.org | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I believe that the most useful and novel inventions and improvements of the present day are mere progressive steps in a highly wrought and highly advanced system suggested by, and dependent on, other previous steps, their whole value and the means of their application probably dependent on the success of some or many other inventions, some old, some new." -Isambard Kingdon Brunel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please DON'T send me files in the non-standard, bloated .doc format that is Microsoft's secret. See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
(En público, por si otros contestan) Es cierto que hace falta un poco de logística Web. ¿Puedes ocuparte de gestionar la parte admintrativa? En ourporjects, o si elformato de ourprojects no es apropiado, existe un proyecto en SourceForge a mi nombre, que se puede utilizar. Se redirecciona el dominio, y adelante. El proceso de los internet Drafts sigue una pauta definida, y su redacción va a ser progresiva. No puedo ocuparme de todo a la vez. Primero el Draft. Podemos seguir en privado, si nadie más contesta. Natxo
participants (2)
-
I.R.Maturana -
Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado